Talk:Hunter Biden

Derogatory Terms Make the Article Less Convincing

I suggest that all derogatory terms like "Princeling"be deleted and objective terms used. Such terms make an objective reader doubt the veracity of the article. You shoot yourself in the foot with stuff like "white-privileged." (Thunkful2 (talk) 16:19, 1 November 2020 (EST))

The terms used reinforces the points mentioned. Since I'm not the top expert on this topic, perhaps RobSmith can help provide some extra-extensive input. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Sunday, 16:23, 1 November 2020 (EST)

All these terms do is reinforce that the article is not objective, but derogatory. Such language just demeans the Conservapedia. Another example is saying "kicked out" instead of given a ___ discharge naming the actual category used. (Thunkful2 (talk) 16:25, 1 November 2020 (EST))

The Laptop Information Should be carefully added.

I think that the issue of the Laptop discovery and the publication of alleged Hunter Biden videos and files should be carefully added. I don't know if the allegations of sex crimes with young girls and incest can be added as they yet probably don't have a high enough validation by proof. This material has been described by Giullian and OAN News, published by GTV.org / GNews.org. It is reported also that a state media outlet in Russia has been broadcasting such material. https://gnews.org/513667/ (Thunkful2 (talk) 16:34, 1 November 2020 (EST))

I agree. We don't want to miss the forest from the trees. I propose putting near the bottom above the ==Personal== a subhead ==Veracity of evidence==. Here the anti-Rudy trolls can put all their junk. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 14:57, 2 November 2020 (EST)

Hunter Biden makes the Best Seller list

with 30,000 page views. Not bad, he did it in about one year. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 20:31, October 12, 2021 (EDT)