Difference between revisions of "Apollo conspiracy theory"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(adding category to uncategorized page)
m (→‎top: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://science.nasa.gov → https://science.nasa.gov)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
There has been speculation that the Apollo moon landing missions never actually took place, that it was a hoax filmed in a Hollywood studio. Supporting this interpretation is the fact that the American flag placed on the Moon should not wave, though it appears it does. Also, no stars appear in the lunar sky in photographs supposedly taken on the Moon, as they would be expected to do.  Moreover, the shadows in the photographs run in different directions, rather than parallel, as if the sun were not the source of light. <ref>http://primeline-america.com/moon-ldg/</ref>
+
The '''[[Project Apollo|Apollo]] [[conspiracy theory]]''' is the allegation that the Apollo moon landing missions never actually took place and that the lunar landings were filmed in a Hollywood studio.  
  
−
[[NASA]] denies this, claiming that it can be conclusively demonstrated scientifically that the astronauts really went to the moon, for example, by analyzing the ages and composition of the rocks brought back by the astronauts. <ref>[http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm , The Great Moon Hoax (NASA)]</ref>
+
The "evidence" for this demonstrably false belief includes the allegation that the American flag placed on the Moon appears to wave in the windless lunar environment, the absence of stars in the lunar sky in photographs taken on the Moon (an effect of the speed of the film the astronauts used), and the allegation that shadows in the photographs run in different directions, rather than parallel, as if the sun were not the source of light.<ref>http://primeline-america.com/moon-ldg/</ref>  Additionally, some point out that when shaded by the landing module, the astronauts should appear shaded.  Rather, they appear well lit.
 +
 
 +
These claims are easily refuted: the flag was made stiff by rods inserted into it, and thus small vibrations, say from an astronauts hand, were amplified.  If the exposure of the camera had been set high enough to see stars, the lunar surface would have appeared blindingly white in photographs.  And shadows can appear to fall in different directions on uneven ground.  Additionally, the varied surface of the moon reflects light, making objects which should be shaded well lit.
 +
 
 +
[[NASA]] notes that it can be conclusively demonstrated scientifically that the astronauts really went to the moon.  One of many possible demonstrations uses ground lasers reflecting off mirrors placed by astronauts during their visits.<ref>[https://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm The Great Moon Hoax (NASA)]</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 8: Line 12:
  
 
[[Category:Space Exploration]]
 
[[Category:Space Exploration]]
 +
[[Category:Moon]]
 +
[[Category:Conspiracy Theory]]

Latest revision as of 13:24, September 26, 2018

The Apollo conspiracy theory is the allegation that the Apollo moon landing missions never actually took place and that the lunar landings were filmed in a Hollywood studio.

The "evidence" for this demonstrably false belief includes the allegation that the American flag placed on the Moon appears to wave in the windless lunar environment, the absence of stars in the lunar sky in photographs taken on the Moon (an effect of the speed of the film the astronauts used), and the allegation that shadows in the photographs run in different directions, rather than parallel, as if the sun were not the source of light.[1] Additionally, some point out that when shaded by the landing module, the astronauts should appear shaded. Rather, they appear well lit.

These claims are easily refuted: the flag was made stiff by rods inserted into it, and thus small vibrations, say from an astronauts hand, were amplified. If the exposure of the camera had been set high enough to see stars, the lunar surface would have appeared blindingly white in photographs. And shadows can appear to fall in different directions on uneven ground. Additionally, the varied surface of the moon reflects light, making objects which should be shaded well lit.

NASA notes that it can be conclusively demonstrated scientifically that the astronauts really went to the moon. One of many possible demonstrations uses ground lasers reflecting off mirrors placed by astronauts during their visits.[2]

References