Difference between revisions of "Debate:Define Civil War"
Middle Man (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| − | + | 1% is enough for a war (in most countries the military comprises less than 1% of the total population): it means 1 out of every 50 males is fighting, which probably means something like 1 out of every 30 able bodied males: so chances are every Iraqi knows at least 1 person who's fighting for some faction. | |
| − | |||
If this is not a civil war, then what is it? | If this is not a civil war, then what is it? | ||
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]] | [[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]] | ||
Revision as of 20:23, May 2, 2007
Again, liberals have skewered another meaning, this time civil war. Iraq is a low level civil war, they claim. I didn't know there were so many levels of civil war. 25,000 Al Qaeda bandits try to provoke Sunnis and Shiites to fight each other. Out 24 million citizens, how many people are fighting for one side or another? possibly 1%? Then 240k people are fighting each other in a low level civil war?--jp 20:48, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
1% is enough for a war (in most countries the military comprises less than 1% of the total population): it means 1 out of every 50 males is fighting, which probably means something like 1 out of every 30 able bodied males: so chances are every Iraqi knows at least 1 person who's fighting for some faction.
If this is not a civil war, then what is it?