Difference between revisions of "Talk:Russiagate"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(why we should have this page?)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
On March 7, I have already started CP's presentation of Trump's allegations of wiretapping in the [[Barack Obama Controversies]] and [[Barack Hussein Obama]] articles.  I do not object to a separate timeline, provided that we also have good prose coverage there.  I believe that timelines fail to provide full context, and sometime editors can quibble in attaching dates to various events. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 06:16, 9 March 2017 (EST)
 
On March 7, I have already started CP's presentation of Trump's allegations of wiretapping in the [[Barack Obama Controversies]] and [[Barack Hussein Obama]] articles.  I do not object to a separate timeline, provided that we also have good prose coverage there.  I believe that timelines fail to provide full context, and sometime editors can quibble in attaching dates to various events. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 06:16, 9 March 2017 (EST)
 +
:I'm anticipating this will be drawn out for months - with future revelations to come and gaps to be filled in. As more is uncovered, this timeline is intended to be a guidepost for giving context to other articles where a prose narrative will explore in depth.
 +
:My biggest fear and concern at this point is to keep the [[fake news]] story "Russiagate" off this page entirely (hopefully) as it can be assumed a merging or confusing of the two by msm is their best strategy to neutralize the devastating impact this story will have once its full dimensions are known. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|CIA vs Trump. Who's gonna win?]]</sup> 10:19, 9 March 2017 (EST)

Revision as of 15:19, March 9, 2017

On March 7, I have already started CP's presentation of Trump's allegations of wiretapping in the Barack Obama Controversies and Barack Hussein Obama articles. I do not object to a separate timeline, provided that we also have good prose coverage there. I believe that timelines fail to provide full context, and sometime editors can quibble in attaching dates to various events. Thanks, JDano (talk) 06:16, 9 March 2017 (EST)

I'm anticipating this will be drawn out for months - with future revelations to come and gaps to be filled in. As more is uncovered, this timeline is intended to be a guidepost for giving context to other articles where a prose narrative will explore in depth.
My biggest fear and concern at this point is to keep the fake news story "Russiagate" off this page entirely (hopefully) as it can be assumed a merging or confusing of the two by msm is their best strategy to neutralize the devastating impact this story will have once its full dimensions are known. RobSCIA vs Trump. Who's gonna win? 10:19, 9 March 2017 (EST)