Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sadism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Wording change: new section) |
(Paradoxical standards.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Hi. I just changed the phrase "This is morally '''straightforward''' if the victim is innocent, or does not consent." To "This is morally '''wrong''' if the victim is innocent, or does not consent." I do not see how the first phrase made scene. I think it might have been liberal vandalism. --[[User:AmeliaJ|AmeliaJ]] 15:33, 28 December 2008 (EST) | Hi. I just changed the phrase "This is morally '''straightforward''' if the victim is innocent, or does not consent." To "This is morally '''wrong''' if the victim is innocent, or does not consent." I do not see how the first phrase made scene. I think it might have been liberal vandalism. --[[User:AmeliaJ|AmeliaJ]] 15:33, 28 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Regarding masochism== | ||
| + | Masochism is the pairing of moral sadism, so why can't I edit/create that page while being able to completely rewrite this one? --[[User:Pious|Pious]] 11:54, 3 August 2016 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:55, August 4, 2016
One could simply sculpt it into a Conservapedia view. How would anybody make any articles based on fact if Wikipedia already has all those facts? --Eiyuu Kou 14:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Wording change
Hi. I just changed the phrase "This is morally straightforward if the victim is innocent, or does not consent." To "This is morally wrong if the victim is innocent, or does not consent." I do not see how the first phrase made scene. I think it might have been liberal vandalism. --AmeliaJ 15:33, 28 December 2008 (EST)
Regarding masochism
Masochism is the pairing of moral sadism, so why can't I edit/create that page while being able to completely rewrite this one? --Pious 11:54, 3 August 2016 (CDT)