Difference between revisions of "Paradigm"
({{merge|paradigm shift}}) |
(raw paste from paradigm shift) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{merge|paradigm shift}} | {{merge|paradigm shift}} | ||
In the ''Structure of Scientific Revolutions'', [[Kuhn]] asserts that there are paradigms under which a scientific community operates. Someone working within the paradigm makes certain assumptions and fails to question those basic assumptions to the point that he or she is not even aware they exist. [http://www.physics.uncc.edu/physstaff/mhdancy/papers/Dancy_gender.pdf] | In the ''Structure of Scientific Revolutions'', [[Kuhn]] asserts that there are paradigms under which a scientific community operates. Someone working within the paradigm makes certain assumptions and fails to question those basic assumptions to the point that he or she is not even aware they exist. [http://www.physics.uncc.edu/physstaff/mhdancy/papers/Dancy_gender.pdf] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Paradigm shift== | ||
| + | |||
| + | MSN's Encarta defines a '''paradigm shift''' as "a radical change in somebody's basic assumptions about or approach to something."[http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_701708536/paradigm_shift.html]. The term paradigm shift was introduced by [[Thomas Kuhn]] in his 1962 book ''[[The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]]''. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy wrote the following regarding Kuhn's concept of the paradigm shift: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;"> | ||
| + | "A mature science, according to Kuhn, experiences alternating phases of normal science and revolutions. In normal science the key theories, instruments, values and metaphysical assumptions that comprise the disciplinary matrix are kept fixed, permitting the cumulative generation of puzzle-solutions, whereas in a scientific revolution the disciplinary matrix undergoes revision, in order to permit the solution of the more serious [[Anomaly|anomalous]] puzzles that disturbed the preceding period of normal science." [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/#3] | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | Kuhn had a theory about the history of science which denied the existence of scientific progress, and which denied the rationality of scientists switching from one theory to another. He popularized the term "paradigm shift" to describe such a switch. | ||
Revision as of 10:55, April 25, 2007
In the Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn asserts that there are paradigms under which a scientific community operates. Someone working within the paradigm makes certain assumptions and fails to question those basic assumptions to the point that he or she is not even aware they exist. [1]
Paradigm shift
MSN's Encarta defines a paradigm shift as "a radical change in somebody's basic assumptions about or approach to something."[2]. The term paradigm shift was introduced by Thomas Kuhn in his 1962 book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy wrote the following regarding Kuhn's concept of the paradigm shift:
"A mature science, according to Kuhn, experiences alternating phases of normal science and revolutions. In normal science the key theories, instruments, values and metaphysical assumptions that comprise the disciplinary matrix are kept fixed, permitting the cumulative generation of puzzle-solutions, whereas in a scientific revolution the disciplinary matrix undergoes revision, in order to permit the solution of the more serious anomalous puzzles that disturbed the preceding period of normal science." [3]
Kuhn had a theory about the history of science which denied the existence of scientific progress, and which denied the rationality of scientists switching from one theory to another. He popularized the term "paradigm shift" to describe such a switch.