Difference between revisions of "Stephen Danforth v. Minnesota"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: This case presents a question to the U.S. Supreme Court concerning criminal law:<ref> U.S. Supreme Court. Danforth v. Minnesota, No. 06-8273. Certiorari granted May 23, 2007. Rulin...) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (clean up & uniformity) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This case presents a question to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] concerning [[criminal law]]:<ref> U.S. Supreme Court. Danforth v. Minnesota, No. 06-8273. Certiorari granted May 23, 2007. Ruling below: 718 N.W.2d 451 (Minn. 2006).</ref> | + | This case presents a question to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] concerning [[criminal law]]:<ref>U.S. Supreme Court. Danforth v. Minnesota, No. 06-8273. Certiorari granted May 23, 2007. Ruling below: 718 N.W.2d 451 (Minn. 2006).</ref> |
| − | *Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. Lane to determine whether U.S. Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases? | + | *Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in [[Teague v. Lane]] to determine whether U.S. Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases? |
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | [[ | + | |
| + | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:44, July 13, 2016
This case presents a question to the U.S. Supreme Court concerning criminal law:[1]
- Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. Lane to determine whether U.S. Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases?
References
- ↑ U.S. Supreme Court. Danforth v. Minnesota, No. 06-8273. Certiorari granted May 23, 2007. Ruling below: 718 N.W.2d 451 (Minn. 2006).