Difference between revisions of "Spreading"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→See also: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In essence, the tactic is similar to a [[filibuster]], another rhetorical strategy that exploits limited time scenarios. | In essence, the tactic is similar to a [[filibuster]], another rhetorical strategy that exploits limited time scenarios. | ||
| − | + | ==See also== | |
| + | |||
| + | [[Evolution]] | ||
[[Category:Law]] | [[Category:Law]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:37, July 13, 2016
Spreading is a rhetorical strategy used by debaters, such as attorneys. The method is to overload the opponent with a mass of information of dubious (or nonexistent) factuality, all of which the opponent must then refute. The goal is to bog the opponent down, especially in a scenario with limited time, to obtain victory by sheer confusion.
In essence, the tactic is similar to a filibuster, another rhetorical strategy that exploits limited time scenarios.