Difference between revisions of "Spreading"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎See also: clean up & uniformity)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{stub}}
+
'''Spreading''' is a rhetorical strategy used by debaters, such as attorneys. The method is to overload the opponent with a mass of information of dubious (or nonexistent) factuality, all of which the opponent must then refute. The goal is to bog the opponent down, especially in a scenario with limited time, to obtain victory by sheer confusion.
  
−
Spreading is a rhetorical trick used by debators, such as attorneys. The trick consists of overloading the opponent with a mass of information of dubious (or nonexistent) factuality, all of which the opponent must then refute. The goal is to bog the opponent down, especially in a scenario with limited time, to obtain victory by sheer confusion.
+
In essence, the tactic is similar to a [[filibuster]], another rhetorical strategy that exploits limited time scenarios.
  
−
In essence, the tactic is similar to a [[filibuster]], another rhetorical trick playing upon limited time scenarios.
+
==See also==
 +
 
 +
[[Evolution]]
  
 
[[Category:Law]]
 
[[Category:Law]]

Latest revision as of 19:37, July 13, 2016

Spreading is a rhetorical strategy used by debaters, such as attorneys. The method is to overload the opponent with a mass of information of dubious (or nonexistent) factuality, all of which the opponent must then refute. The goal is to bog the opponent down, especially in a scenario with limited time, to obtain victory by sheer confusion.

In essence, the tactic is similar to a filibuster, another rhetorical strategy that exploits limited time scenarios.

See also

Evolution