Difference between revisions of "Kyles v. Whitley"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In ''Kyles v. Whitley'', 514 U.S. 419, 437 (1995), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a prosecutor has a constitutional obligation to learn of, to preserve, and to communicate with the d...) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In ''Kyles v. Whitley'', 514 U.S. 419, 437 (1995), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that a prosecutor has a constitutional obligation to learn of, to preserve, and to communicate with the defense | + | In '''''Kyles v. Whitley''''', 514 U.S. 419, 437 (1995), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that a prosecutor has a constitutional obligation to learn of, to preserve, and to communicate with the defense any exculpatory and impeachment evidence in the government's possession. |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
Latest revision as of 15:06, July 13, 2016
In Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 437 (1995), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a prosecutor has a constitutional obligation to learn of, to preserve, and to communicate with the defense any exculpatory and impeachment evidence in the government's possession.