Difference between revisions of "Major questions doctrine"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Aschlafly moved page Major question doctrine to Major questions doctrine: should be an "s" after "question") |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Spelling, Grammar, and General Cleanup) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In a nutshell, '''major question doctrine''' establishes that little or no deference will be allowed by courts in review of agency decisions that implicate major issues, such as whether the [[FDA]] has the authority to regulate tobacco. | In a nutshell, '''major question doctrine''' establishes that little or no deference will be allowed by courts in review of agency decisions that implicate major issues, such as whether the [[FDA]] has the authority to regulate tobacco. | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Administrative Law]] |
Revision as of 14:06, July 1, 2016
Major questions doctrine is an independent, stand-alone exception to Chevron doctrine in administrative law. It is also known by the expression "major questions exception," because it is a narrow (and debatable) exception to a well-established precedent.[1]
In a nutshell, major question doctrine establishes that little or no deference will be allowed by courts in review of agency decisions that implicate major issues, such as whether the FDA has the authority to regulate tobacco.