Difference between revisions of "User talk:Cptstubing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(@User:Karajou) |
m (link) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
And your sources to prove we have a bias? Plus, your sources that proves the liberal side of the fence is all lollipops and cuddly animals. I would love to see them. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 05:48, 26 February 2015 (EST) | And your sources to prove we have a bias? Plus, your sources that proves the liberal side of the fence is all lollipops and cuddly animals. I would love to see them. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 05:48, 26 February 2015 (EST) | ||
| − | :It seems to be absurd to claim that Conservapedia has no bias! Karajou, you yourself wrote about the [[Conservapedia Bible Project]]: | + | :It seems to be absurd to claim that Conservapedia has no bias! Karajou, [[Talk:Conservative_Bible_Project/Archive_1#Wouldn.27t_a_Neutral_Bible_project_be_more_useful.3F|you yourself wrote]] about the [[Conservapedia Bible Project]]: |
::"''It's already proven in all walks of life that liberals are either liars or lunatics, so any percentage of liberalism in the project just isn't going to happen. Karajou 14:19, 14 October 2009 (EDT) ''" | ::"''It's already proven in all walks of life that liberals are either liars or lunatics, so any percentage of liberalism in the project just isn't going to happen. Karajou 14:19, 14 October 2009 (EDT) ''" | ||
:So, if there is a conservative claim and a liberal claim, Conservapedia will side with the conservative position, as the liberal position is compromised per se. That's pretty much a textbook example of [[bias]]. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 07:17, 26 February 2015 (EST) | :So, if there is a conservative claim and a liberal claim, Conservapedia will side with the conservative position, as the liberal position is compromised per se. That's pretty much a textbook example of [[bias]]. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 07:17, 26 February 2015 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:24, February 26, 2015
And your sources to prove we have a bias? Plus, your sources that proves the liberal side of the fence is all lollipops and cuddly animals. I would love to see them. Karajou 05:48, 26 February 2015 (EST)
- It seems to be absurd to claim that Conservapedia has no bias! Karajou, you yourself wrote about the Conservapedia Bible Project:
- "It's already proven in all walks of life that liberals are either liars or lunatics, so any percentage of liberalism in the project just isn't going to happen. Karajou 14:19, 14 October 2009 (EDT) "
- So, if there is a conservative claim and a liberal claim, Conservapedia will side with the conservative position, as the liberal position is compromised per se. That's pretty much a textbook example of bias. --AugustO 07:17, 26 February 2015 (EST)