Difference between revisions of "User talk:Cptstubing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "And your sources to prove we have a bias? Plus, your sources that proves the liberal side of the fence is all lollipops and cuddly animals. I would love to see them. ~~~~") |
(@User:Karajou) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
And your sources to prove we have a bias? Plus, your sources that proves the liberal side of the fence is all lollipops and cuddly animals. I would love to see them. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 05:48, 26 February 2015 (EST) | And your sources to prove we have a bias? Plus, your sources that proves the liberal side of the fence is all lollipops and cuddly animals. I would love to see them. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 05:48, 26 February 2015 (EST) | ||
| + | :It seems to be absurd to claim that Conservapedia has no bias! Karajou, you yourself wrote about the [[Conservapedia Bible Project]]: | ||
| + | ::"''It's already proven in all walks of life that liberals are either liars or lunatics, so any percentage of liberalism in the project just isn't going to happen. Karajou 14:19, 14 October 2009 (EDT) ''" | ||
| + | :So, if there is a conservative claim and a liberal claim, Conservapedia will side with the conservative position, as the liberal position is compromised per se. That's pretty much a textbook example of [[bias]]. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 07:17, 26 February 2015 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:17, February 26, 2015
And your sources to prove we have a bias? Plus, your sources that proves the liberal side of the fence is all lollipops and cuddly animals. I would love to see them. Karajou 05:48, 26 February 2015 (EST)
- It seems to be absurd to claim that Conservapedia has no bias! Karajou, you yourself wrote about the Conservapedia Bible Project:
- "It's already proven in all walks of life that liberals are either liars or lunatics, so any percentage of liberalism in the project just isn't going to happen. Karajou 14:19, 14 October 2009 (EDT) "
- So, if there is a conservative claim and a liberal claim, Conservapedia will side with the conservative position, as the liberal position is compromised per se. That's pretty much a textbook example of bias. --AugustO 07:17, 26 February 2015 (EST)