Changes
Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/Jonat|Jonat]] ([[User talk:Jonat|talk]]) to last revision by [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]
::: But there is a difference between asserting that the theory of evolution is true (I.E. that it is factual), and a person asserting that their ''belief'' in it is true (I.E. that they ''truly'' believe in it). The text currently suggests that evolution syndrome is an insistance that one has a true belief in evolution. Are you implying that sufferers of this 'syndrome' do not actually truly believe in evolution despite insisting that they do? [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 15:15, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
::::Since there's been no response, I have taken the iniative & changed the wording. I am assuming that the intended meaning is that sufferers of this "syndrome" insist that evolution itself is true, not only that they truly believe in it. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]]
::::: Is there any evidence to support a theory counter to that of evolution? Yes - scientists do not suffer fools gladly (nor do most people). Insisting beliefs are true does not make them so. Theories need to make predictions that are verifiable. Can we get some reference for counter evolutionary evidence? This articles lacks any references at all. --[[User:Scasey|Scasey]] 10:27, 3 December 2009 (EST)
::::: See [[Counterexamples to evolution]]. As to your fallacious argument that something must be true if it is considered better than an alternative, that argument does not work in mathematical proofs, it doesn't work in logic, and it doesn't fool anyone here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:37, 3 December 2009 (EST)
==Most atheists to many atheists change==
