Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:AFD Islam and tolerance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(delete) |
(okay, template space it is) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Indeed, but articles should also be useful by themselves. In this case, it is not. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 17:03, 5 July 2013 (EDT) | ::Indeed, but articles should also be useful by themselves. In this case, it is not. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 17:03, 5 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
::''Delete.'' [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 09:19, 6 July 2013 (EDT) | ::''Delete.'' [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 09:19, 6 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree that the short quotation, by itself, does not constitute an article. Like the crucial message in [[Crimson Tide]], it is merely a fragment. Template space is a great place for it. Thanks for the heads-up. | ||
| + | |||
| + | By the way, it really is a pleasure working '''with''' you guys, rather than butting heads. :P --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:20, 6 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:20, July 6, 2013
The article in question is a single qoute, without any context. The alternative is to move it into templatespace. brenden 16:41, 5 July 2013 (EDT)
- Let me quote the CP Commandments: "Any content you create or change [...] must be family-friendly, clean, concise, and without gossip or foul language. [emphasis added]". It manages to succinctly summarize a complex subject with a few short sentences, rather than engaging in excessive liberal jibbar jabbar. - Markman 16:52, 5 July 2013 (EDT)
I agree that the short quotation, by itself, does not constitute an article. Like the crucial message in Crimson Tide, it is merely a fragment. Template space is a great place for it. Thanks for the heads-up.
By the way, it really is a pleasure working with you guys, rather than butting heads. :P --Ed Poor Talk 12:20, 6 July 2013 (EDT)