Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dave07"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
::Indeed, but you have no right to be heard.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 21:20, 28 February 2013 (EST)
 
::Indeed, but you have no right to be heard.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 21:20, 28 February 2013 (EST)
 
:::It is extremely ironic how much you seem to love the Constitution when you clearly don't understand the First Amendment.  I have as much of a right to be heard as you do.  You tend to think I just actually agree with you and don't, but that is a misconception.  I do not lie about philosophy.
 
:::It is extremely ironic how much you seem to love the Constitution when you clearly don't understand the First Amendment.  I have as much of a right to be heard as you do.  You tend to think I just actually agree with you and don't, but that is a misconception.  I do not lie about philosophy.
 +
::::You have no right to be heard '''here''' though.  Why on earth would you think the first amendment applied to this website?  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 21:44, 28 February 2013 (EST)

Revision as of 02:44, March 1, 2013

If you wish to make changes that significantly alter the nature and meaning of the articles I suggest you bring it up on the talk pages first. --DamianJohn 20:00, 28 February 2013 (EST)

I have a right to be right. Dave07 21:16, 28 February 2013 (EST)
Indeed, but you have no right to be heard. --DamianJohn 21:20, 28 February 2013 (EST)
It is extremely ironic how much you seem to love the Constitution when you clearly don't understand the First Amendment. I have as much of a right to be heard as you do. You tend to think I just actually agree with you and don't, but that is a misconception. I do not lie about philosophy.
You have no right to be heard here though. Why on earth would you think the first amendment applied to this website? --DamianJohn 21:44, 28 February 2013 (EST)