Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bill Richardson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::I agree; we need the [[racism]] charges relating to the Wen Ho Lee case. Looks like he's not getting nominated, so no sense holding back anylonger. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:39, 20 August 2007 (EDT) | ::I agree; we need the [[racism]] charges relating to the Wen Ho Lee case. Looks like he's not getting nominated, so no sense holding back anylonger. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:39, 20 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
The statement, "Iowa, for good reason, for constitutional reasons, for reasons related to the Lord, should be the first caucus and primary.", was a joke and shouldn't be treated so seriously. | The statement, "Iowa, for good reason, for constitutional reasons, for reasons related to the Lord, should be the first caucus and primary.", was a joke and shouldn't be treated so seriously. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I quote: ''"Although Richardson has no historic connection to the [[Latino]] population of the U.S. (his mother was from Mexico),...)"'' Why did Richardson have no "historic connection" to his mother? I thought we all have historic connections to our mothers. Even Democrats. | ||
Revision as of 06:25, February 8, 2013
Recommend
Conservapedia:Manual of Style/Politicians - Myk 02:23, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
Is it balanced?
I think this article could use some balancing out. -Additioner 20:32, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
- The article is not protected; since you're an editor... make the changes. --Crocoite 20:36, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
The statement, "Iowa, for good reason, for constitutional reasons, for reasons related to the Lord, should be the first caucus and primary.", was a joke and shouldn't be treated so seriously.
- I quote: "Although Richardson has no historic connection to the Latino population of the U.S. (his mother was from Mexico),...)" Why did Richardson have no "historic connection" to his mother? I thought we all have historic connections to our mothers. Even Democrats.