Difference between revisions of "Scientific results"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(must be checked) |
m (cat) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Scientific results in a given area are considered hard facts by the people doing the work. The rest of the world reads the initial reports of the work and treats them as soft evidence, based on the reputation of the author, the author’s institution, and the journal. [http://www.av8n.com/physics/authority.htm] | Scientific results in a given area are considered hard facts by the people doing the work. The rest of the world reads the initial reports of the work and treats them as soft evidence, based on the reputation of the author, the author’s institution, and the journal. [http://www.av8n.com/physics/authority.htm] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[category: science]] | ||
Revision as of 16:45, August 28, 2012
Scientific results in a given area are considered hard facts by the people doing the work. The rest of the world reads the initial reports of the work and treats them as soft evidence, based on the reputation of the author, the author’s institution, and the journal. [1]