Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
In '''''National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius''''' (June 28, 2012), and related cases, the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[ObamaCare]] was not a valid exercise of congressional power under the [[Commerce Clause]], but was a valid exercise of the Taxing Power of [[Congress]].
 
In '''''National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius''''' (June 28, 2012), and related cases, the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[ObamaCare]] was not a valid exercise of congressional power under the [[Commerce Clause]], but was a valid exercise of the Taxing Power of [[Congress]].
 +
 +
== Left Unaddressed by the Opinion ==
 +
*whether ObamaCare is constitutional under the [[Takings Clause]] of the [[Fifth Amendment]]
 +
*whether the passage of ObamaCare violated the [[Presentment Clause]]
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,330

edits

Navigation menu