Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 107:
Line 107: + + + +
Okay, no more Mr. Nice Guy!
I object to some of the terminology here. The article says, "The terms evolutionist and evolutionism carry a connotation of unthinking faith or pseudoscience". I don't think this is true at all. What pseudoscience ends with "-ism"? Then there is "the term Evolutionism is simply a false Creationist perception". I don't think that's right either. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 14:06, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
I object to some of the terminology here. The article says, "The terms evolutionist and evolutionism carry a connotation of unthinking faith or pseudoscience". I don't think this is true at all. What pseudoscience ends with "-ism"? Then there is "the term Evolutionism is simply a false Creationist perception". I don't think that's right either. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 14:06, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:I guess I was being too nice to the liberals. I fell into the habit because I work and live surrounded by them.
:Better to say that (Source A) objects to terms like ''evolutionism'' and ''evolutionist'' on the grounds that they connote, etc. Make it clear that the usage objections are one-sided. I haven't heard any evolutionist complain about the term ''anti-evolutionist''. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:54, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
==Evolutionism as a [[worldview]]==
==Evolutionism as a [[worldview]]==