Changes

:::::::::Just one more point - everything we say on the talk page, or on debate pages, is peripheral to the real work of the site. I'm not that interested in picking apart the arguments made here, I'm interesting in improving the central content of the site. I'm fairly new to this and have contributed far less than many other editors but I'd like to know if anyone else shares my concerns and what people are doing. I really think this could be a great site and I thank everyone who's helped build it as a resource. [[User:KingHanksley|KingHanksley]] 14:29, 6 May 2011 (EDT)

:::::::::Just one more point - everything we say on the talk page, or on debate pages, is peripheral to the real work of the site. I'm not that interested in picking apart the arguments made here, I'm interesting in improving the central content of the site. I'm fairly new to this and have contributed far less than many other editors but I'd like to know if anyone else shares my concerns and what people are doing. I really think this could be a great site and I thank everyone who's helped build it as a resource. [[User:KingHanksley|KingHanksley]] 14:29, 6 May 2011 (EDT)

::::::::::I have to disagree.  I think Conservapedia is already a great site.  Before signing up as an editor I observed the site for a few months and came to respect the culture that has developed here.  Sometimes people come in here so used to the watered down criticism of liberals they see in the mainstream media that they're unable to see the substance behind Conservapedia's critique.  I like the site as it is, and would hate to see it change.  If anything I'd like to see us step up our critique of liberalism.  You complain that our commentary on atheism and Obama aren't nuanced enough.  Again I have to disagree, some moral issues are black and white not shades of gray, as moral relativists would have us believe.  So to present these issues in any other way would be dishonest.  You also have to remember that the content Conservative authors is very popular and brings in a lot of page views. [[User:JimmyRa|JimmyRa]] 21:33, 9 May 2011 (EDT)

::::::::::I have to disagree.  I think Conservapedia is already a great site.  Before signing up as an editor I observed the site for a few months and came to respect the culture that has developed here.  Sometimes people come in here so used to the watered down criticism of liberals they see in the mainstream media that they're unable to see the substance behind Conservapedia's critique.  I like the site as it is, and would hate to see it change.  If anything I'd like to see us step up our critique of liberalism.  You complain that our commentary on atheism and Obama aren't nuanced enough.  Again I have to disagree, some moral issues are black and white not shades of gray, as moral relativists would have us believe.  So to present these issues in any other way would be dishonest.  You also have to remember that the content Conservative authors is very popular and brings in a lot of page views. [[User:JimmyRa|JimmyRa]] 21:33, 9 May 2011 (EDT)