Changes

There's no information about how GWB is being named the Worst President in History [http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history] by alot of people, as well as having some of the lowest approval ratings ever.[http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm][http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/27/opinion/polls/main1350874.shtml] And lack of information about major events in his presidency. Such as Katarina, September 11th and stuff like that.

There's no information about how GWB is being named the Worst President in History [http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history] by alot of people, as well as having some of the lowest approval ratings ever.[http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm][http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/27/opinion/polls/main1350874.shtml] And lack of information about major events in his presidency. Such as Katarina, September 11th and stuff like that.

Hope I did this right..

*Well, still no signature so users will know who you are. This is the ''Conserv''apedia, not Wikipedia. The insertions you are asking about are gossipy, thus against our rules.  Why do you think poll numbers are germain to the article?  Will it make him no longer President?  Will it undo the vote?  No, and several historians, while a President is still in office, rating someone such is moronic. History is the long view, not the short one.  --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 21:31, 4 April 2007 (EDT)