Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,953
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Line 8:
Line 36: +
budgetary reconciliation
'''Reconciliation''' is the process of bringing former enemies or antagonists to a state of peaceable coexistence. This can be applied to individuals, communities, or nations. A major example of institutional reconciliation was the work of the [[Truth and Reconciliation Commission]] in [[South Africa]], established to deal with the wounds left by [[Apartheid]].
'''Reconciliation''' is the process of bringing former enemies or antagonists to a state of peaceable coexistence. This can be applied to individuals, communities, or nations. A major example of institutional reconciliation was the work of the [[Truth and Reconciliation Commission]] in [[South Africa]], established to deal with the wounds left by [[Apartheid]].
==Budget reconciliation==
In American politics, reconciliation, also referred to as the 'nuclear option', is a method of voting by a simple majority instead of a full vote by all members. In the past, this type of vote was intended for budget matters. In 2010, the Democrat majority wants to take over 1/6th of the USA economy by voting simple majority on [[Obamacare | healthcare reform]]. A tactic likely to fail either in passing the legislation or Congressional members retaining their seats for using this type of political power.
In American politics, reconciliation, also referred to as the 'nuclear option', is a method of voting by a simple majority instead of a full vote by all members. In the past, this type of vote was intended for budget matters. In 2010, the Democrat majority wants to take over 1/6th of the USA economy by voting simple majority on [[Obamacare | healthcare reform]]. A tactic likely to fail either in passing the legislation or Congressional members retaining their seats for using this type of political power.
The budget reconciliation process was created in 1974 as part of the law<ref>[http://www.rules.house.gov/archives/jcoc2y.htm THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET AND IMPOUNDMENT CONTROL ACT OF 1974]</ref> that created much of the modern rules and organizational structures used by Congress to pass the annual budget.
This new law required Congress to pass a budget resolution every year that would set the parameters by which the various congressional committees would write their specific parts of the total budget bill.
Within these budget resolutions, instructions can be given to specific congressional committees to create legislation that would alter current laws affecting spending and/or taxation in order to conform to the targets set out in the budget resolution.
To enhance Congress’ ability to meet budget resolution targets, these pieces of legislation are not passed under the normal rules of the Senate. Instead, they fall under the “budget reconciliation process” rules which prohibit unrelated amendments to the bills and set a maximum of 20 hours of debate on the floor. As a practical matter, this means only 51 votes are needed to pass a reconciliation bill because the limit on debate overrides the threat of a filibuster.
==The Byrd Rule to Prevent Abuse of Reconciliation==
While the budget reconciliation process was a success in its principal goal of giving Congress more power to meet the spending and revenue goals of the budget resolution, it quickly became prone to abuse.
Provisions that had nothing to do with meeting budget resolution requirements, even some that directly contradicted them, were passed using the reconciliation process.
To prevent this, the so-called “Byrd Rule,” named after Democratic Sen. [[Robert Byrd]], who introduced the legislation, was passed in 1985 and made permanent in 1990.
The Byrd Rule allows any senator to raise a point of order objection to provisions in a reconciliation bill that they consider extraneous to meeting budget resolutions requirements. Then, it is up to the chair – either the Vice President (as President of the Senate) or, more often, the presiding officer of the Senate if the Vice President is not present -- whether that provision stays or is stricken.
However, the chair almost always relies on the advice of the Senate Parliamentarian to determine if that objection is legitimate.<ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/01/obscure-senate-post-center-attention-health-care-debate/ Obscure Senate Post Becomes Center of Attention in Health Care Debate], [[FOXNews]].com, March 01, 2010.</ref>
This determination is made based on six tests created as part of the Byrd Rule used to weed out provisions that have nothing to do with raising or reducing taxes or spending. It takes a 3/5 majority vote to override the decision of the presiding officer if he or she finds that a provision violates one or more of these tests.<ref>[http://budget.house.gov/crs-reports/RL30862.pdf The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate’s “Byrd Rule”, Robert Keith, Congressional Research Service, March 20, 2008.</ref>
Budget reconciliation has been used for 22 bills, of which, 14 were passed by Republican majorities. Nineteen of those bills were signed into law by the President. Three were vetoed.<ref>[http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/articles/2009/0420_budget_mann/0420_budget_mann.pdf nBudget Reconciliation Bills Signed Into Law, 1980-2008.] brookings.edu</ref> All bills were directly related to taxation and spending, and since 1985, have successfully met the Byrd rule tests.
==References==
{{reflist}}
==External links==
==External links==
*[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704625004575089362731862750.html Abuse of Power (Healthcare Reforms by Reconciliation)]
*[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704625004575089362731862750.html Abuse of Power (Healthcare Reforms by Reconciliation)]
[[category:Dictionary]]
[[category:Dictionary]]
[[Category:Political Terms]]
[[Category:Political Terms]]
[[Category:Budget terms]]