Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
35 bytes added ,  23:04, December 4, 2009
The preeminent British physicist, Sir Fred Hoyle, determined it to be fraudulent.
Line 40: Line 40:  
''Archaeopteryx'' is sometimes presented as evidence of evolution because the bones have some characteristics reminiscent of [[reptile]]s, making it appear to be a so-called "[[transitional form]]" between reptiles and birds.  
 
''Archaeopteryx'' is sometimes presented as evidence of evolution because the bones have some characteristics reminiscent of [[reptile]]s, making it appear to be a so-called "[[transitional form]]" between reptiles and birds.  
   −
There are two criticisms of the ''Archaeopteryx''.  One criticism is that the fossils are fraudulent. Another criticism is that ''Archaeopteryx'' existed but was a true bird and not a transitional form suggesting evolution.
+
There are two criticisms of the ''Archaeopteryx''.  The preeminent British physicist, Sir Fred Hoyle, determined it to be fraudulent. Another criticism is even if ''Archaeopteryx'' existed, it was a true bird and not a transitional form suggesting evolution.
    
== Specimens ==
 
== Specimens ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,350

edits

Navigation menu