1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: +
Conservapedia talk:Articles for deletion (view source)
Revision as of 20:37, March 28, 2007
, 20:37, March 28, 2007no edit summary
::Ah yes, duh. [[Articles for Deletion]] - and I see you found it already. XD --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:22, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::Ah yes, duh. [[Articles for Deletion]] - and I see you found it already. XD --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:22, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::Ah, after checking your Contributions, I begin to realize that you mean two pages with transclusions of the open and closed AFDs, right? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:27, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::Ah, after checking your Contributions, I begin to realize that you mean two pages with transclusions of the open and closed AFDs, right? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:27, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
:::After some thinking, I've come to the conclusion that transclusion may be overkill. I see it being used on Wikipedia for subject-specific things like "video games" or "websites", but we have VERY few AFDs going at a VERY slow rate, so the list should be enough. Encouraging decision-making should be enough on this scale, I think. However, I will make a template for the AFD pages to create links to the Article, the history and the article's talk page, and insert it into the current ones. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:37, 28 March 2007 (EDT)