Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
52 bytes added ,  08:39, April 26, 2009
m
Line 49: Line 49:  
== Evolutionist view ==
 
== Evolutionist view ==
   −
Evolutionary scientists criticize Baraminology, claiming that it lacks rigorous testing and  fails to produce any peer reviewed scientific research.{{fact}} It is regarded as pseudoscience by evolutionary scientists. However their claim has been rejected by creation scientists who described it as a young field still in development and stated that criticism can be resolved with further research<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_3/baraminology.htm The Current Status of Baraminology, Todd Charles Wood, CRSQ Vol 43 No 3, December 2006]</ref>.
+
Evolutionary scientists criticize Baraminology, claiming that it lacks rigorous testing and  fails to produce any peer reviewed scientific research.<ref>www-lmmb.ncifcrf.gov/~toms/paper/ev/blog-ev.html</ref> It is regarded as pseudoscience by evolutionary scientists. However their claim has been rejected by creation scientists who described it as a young field still in development and stated that criticism can be resolved with further research<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_3/baraminology.htm The Current Status of Baraminology, Todd Charles Wood, CRSQ Vol 43 No 3, December 2006]</ref>.
    
No creature has ever been observed changing from one Baramin into another. Evolutionist [[Richard Lenski]] claims to have observed a bacteria evolving, but even if the unproven claim<ref>Batten, Don, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5827 Bacteria ‘evolving in the lab’?], 14th June 2008 (Creation Ministries International)</ref> is true, the bacteria is still bacteria, it has not left its Baramin.
 
No creature has ever been observed changing from one Baramin into another. Evolutionist [[Richard Lenski]] claims to have observed a bacteria evolving, but even if the unproven claim<ref>Batten, Don, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5827 Bacteria ‘evolving in the lab’?], 14th June 2008 (Creation Ministries International)</ref> is true, the bacteria is still bacteria, it has not left its Baramin.
 
{{Creation vs. evolution}}
 
{{Creation vs. evolution}}
 +
 
==Further Information==
 
==Further Information==
 
* [http://www.christiananswers.net/q-crs/baraminology.html What are the Genesis “kinds”? Baraminology—classification of created organisms]
 
* [http://www.christiananswers.net/q-crs/baraminology.html What are the Genesis “kinds”? Baraminology—classification of created organisms]
4,336

edits

Navigation menu