Siteadmin, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
2,144
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: +
Talk:Attack on Pearl Harbor (view source)
Revision as of 15:43, December 16, 2008
, 15:43, December 16, 2008no edit summary
==Revisionist history==
==Revisionist history==
This article should stick with the basic historical facts about the attack. Anything else, such as the theories pertaining to FDR knowing in advance and encouraging it so America could get in the war or what officers ignored evidence, etc, could be considered revisionist history or attack theories. My suggestion would be to write a separate, detailed article on that particular subject. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:36, 16 December 2008 (EST)
This article should stick with the basic historical facts about the attack. Anything else, such as the theories pertaining to FDR knowing in advance and encouraging it so America could get in the war or what officers ignored evidence, etc, could be considered revisionist history or attack theories. My suggestion would be to write a separate, detailed article on that particular subject. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:36, 16 December 2008 (EST)
:I agree. I also think the same should go for all of our articles. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] <small>(CPAdmin1)</small><sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> <sup>[[User:CPAdmin1/Polls|Vote in my NEW polls]]</sup> 10:43, 16 December 2008 (EST)