Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
366 bytes added ,  02:23, November 18, 2008
Line 259: Line 259:  
==Lenski's Position II==
 
==Lenski's Position II==
 
Why the removal of the mention of his position again?  I figured that having a named professorship was something noteworthy in the article.  (Noteworthy in what way is up to the reader.  I view it as more of a black mark on MSU's case than in favor of Lenski, especially given his refusal to actually disclose his data.  If this should be explicit in the entry, please tell me and I'll do my best to put it in.) For the moment, I'm not touching the page, but I am confused as to why an edit I made close to a month ago was changed back now.  [[User:ArnoldFriend|ArnoldFriend]] 21:14, 17 November 2008 (EST)
 
Why the removal of the mention of his position again?  I figured that having a named professorship was something noteworthy in the article.  (Noteworthy in what way is up to the reader.  I view it as more of a black mark on MSU's case than in favor of Lenski, especially given his refusal to actually disclose his data.  If this should be explicit in the entry, please tell me and I'll do my best to put it in.) For the moment, I'm not touching the page, but I am confused as to why an edit I made close to a month ago was changed back now.  [[User:ArnoldFriend|ArnoldFriend]] 21:14, 17 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
: The academic titles are silly and misleading, particularly when there is no explanation of the process behind the title.  He's a professor, and that does have a well-established meaning.  Beyond that someone has to make a case for explaining the significance of an additional title before including it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:23, 17 November 2008 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,341

edits

Navigation menu