nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: − − == In languages == − − In the more intellectually honest field of linguistics, even non-believer researchers accept the principle of baramin-like groups ("families") of languages; the [[proto-world]] theory that holds that there is a single origin for all languages has been broadly rejected.
Revert; It may be an interesting parallel, but it's got nothing to do with baraminology.
Evolutionist scientists criticize Baraminology. These people claim Baraminology lacks rigorous testing and fails to produce any peer reviewed scientific research.{{fact}} It is regarded as pseudoscience by evolutionist scientists. However their claim has been rejected by creation scientists who described it as a young field still in development and stated that criticism can be resolved with further research<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_3/baraminology.htm The Current Status of Baraminology, Todd Charles Wood, CRSQ Vol 43 No 3, December 2006]</ref>.
Evolutionist scientists criticize Baraminology. These people claim Baraminology lacks rigorous testing and fails to produce any peer reviewed scientific research.{{fact}} It is regarded as pseudoscience by evolutionist scientists. However their claim has been rejected by creation scientists who described it as a young field still in development and stated that criticism can be resolved with further research<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_3/baraminology.htm The Current Status of Baraminology, Todd Charles Wood, CRSQ Vol 43 No 3, December 2006]</ref>.
==Further Information==
==Further Information==