1,129
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: + +
Natural science(ism?) - not evolutionism.
:::I agree about the separate article, and it [[Theory of evolution|already exists]]. However, in that same section you cited, you missed this sentence: "Some proponents of the scientific theory of evolution reject the idea of a philosophy or worldview that guides their conclusions in scientific experimentation." That section does need to be fleshed out more, but it does acknowledge what you are saying as one opinion on the issue. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 19:32, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:::I agree about the separate article, and it [[Theory of evolution|already exists]]. However, in that same section you cited, you missed this sentence: "Some proponents of the scientific theory of evolution reject the idea of a philosophy or worldview that guides their conclusions in scientific experimentation." That section does need to be fleshed out more, but it does acknowledge what you are saying as one opinion on the issue. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 19:32, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
::: The theory of evolution is based on the worldview of natural science - the attempt to explain as much of the world as possible without resorting to supernatural intervention. There was no geneticsism prior to Mendel. There was no evolutionism prior to Darwin. These were people who saw something and then tried to explain it without an appeal to a higher power. The natural science worldview can be traced back to ancient Greece without difficulty.--[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:33, 21 March 2007 (EDT)