229
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + +
Talk:Internet parodist (view source)
Revision as of 15:51, October 24, 2008
, 15:51, October 24, 2008no edit summary
I am a rotten liberal, atheist but I still feel that I basically agree with the gist of this article. I feel that it is perfectly legitimate to edit or debate or even to use humor or sarcasm on Conservapedia but I think to disguise yourself as a parodists or to be a vandal is pretty unproductive. [[User:MichaelFAnderson|MichaelFAnderson]] 10:08, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
I am a rotten liberal, atheist but I still feel that I basically agree with the gist of this article. I feel that it is perfectly legitimate to edit or debate or even to use humor or sarcasm on Conservapedia but I think to disguise yourself as a parodists or to be a vandal is pretty unproductive. [[User:MichaelFAnderson|MichaelFAnderson]] 10:08, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
: Appreciate your perspective. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 10:59, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
: Appreciate your perspective. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 10:59, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
==Capitalization==
How come the article changes from the convention of not capitalizing the names of political viewpoitns (Here being conservative and liberal) to capitalizing them in the last section of the article? Is this stylistic, or should it be fixed? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 11:51, 24 October 2008 (EDT)