Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: +
no edit summary
::::::Ok I did post some links, but the spam filter blocked it so I lost my post. Ungtss, you are correct. Every cite I can find says that either reverse racism is "racism by or for the benefit of those who have historically suffered from racism" OR that that is the common definition, which isn't technically "reversed". Can't we just say that in the article? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:29, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
::::::Ok I did post some links, but the spam filter blocked it so I lost my post. Ungtss, you are correct. Every cite I can find says that either reverse racism is "racism by or for the benefit of those who have historically suffered from racism" OR that that is the common definition, which isn't technically "reversed". Can't we just say that in the article? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:29, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::::I am all for its correct meaning, a change is welcomed. Did Hastings historically suffer, or was a descendant of a suffered group, that can now claim hunters as anti-Semitic? Racism charges from somebody that has been protected from racism? I am still in the dark here. --'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 15:36, 20 October 2008 (EDT)