1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 75:
Line 75: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 02:10, March 18, 2007
, 02:10, March 18, 2007→Palestinian people on Wikipedia
::::Why must it be acknowledged in the article itself? "In 1972, a terrorist organization some believe to have been controlled by a faction of the PLO..." If you want to add it in there, go ahead. Just try to keep a neutral tone.
::::Why must it be acknowledged in the article itself? "In 1972, a terrorist organization some believe to have been controlled by a faction of the PLO..." If you want to add it in there, go ahead. Just try to keep a neutral tone.
:::::Besides, the Munich massacre has its own article. Why does an already long article need to state stuff that's extensively covered in other articles already? And yes, I agree that several things on the list fall/fell into the "Well, then just add it!" category. But Conservapedia appears to be more proud of pointing and shouting so that it can praise itself for doing so once somebody edits the article. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 22:10, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
== The Face of Terror: Basque ETA? ==
== The Face of Terror: Basque ETA? ==