4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 372:
Line 372: − + − +
Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (view source)
Revision as of 18:13, April 21, 2008
, 18:13, April 21, 2008→Wikipedia chimes in
::: The bottom line is that the Wikipedia entry on "Expelled" is predictably and extremely biased. No one can seriously dispute that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:55, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
::: The bottom line is that the Wikipedia entry on "Expelled" is predictably and extremely biased. No one can seriously dispute that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:55, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
::::Let's assume that the locking of the article was to promote bias. Is the permanent locking of all controversial articles on CP ''not'' bias? Is the suppression of dissent here somehow excusable?
::::Let's assume that the locking of the article on WP was to promote bias. Is the permanent locking of all controversial articles on CP ''not'' bias? Is the suppression of dissent here somehow excusable?
::::Does one hand know what the other is doing?-[[User:Stacw|Stacw]] 14:12, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
::::Does one hand know what the other is doing? I look forward to you proving my point by blocking me.-[[User:Stacw|Stacw]] 14:12, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
As someone who has worked on both the Wikipedia and Conservapedia articles on this topic, I can attest that the Wikipedia article is indeed highly biased (though it is getting better, with collaborative editing), but this article has problems with bias (in the opposite direction) as well, as some editors seem to have introduced personal opinion and unsourced speculation since I last worked on the article. I'm currently trying to improve this situation. [[User:Walton One|Walton One]] 14:05, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
As someone who has worked on both the Wikipedia and Conservapedia articles on this topic, I can attest that the Wikipedia article is indeed highly biased (though it is getting better, with collaborative editing), but this article has problems with bias (in the opposite direction) as well, as some editors seem to have introduced personal opinion and unsourced speculation since I last worked on the article. I'm currently trying to improve this situation. [[User:Walton One|Walton One]] 14:05, 21 April 2008 (EDT)