58
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + + +
justifcation for no fair use
: I do not agree. No valid reason. You have to bring here your legal sources for your claims. It seems to be only your opinion of what is good and what is wrong. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 14:30, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
: I do not agree. No valid reason. You have to bring here your legal sources for your claims. It seems to be only your opinion of what is good and what is wrong. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 14:30, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
::Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107:
:::Notwithstanding the provisions of sections § 106 and § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include
::A picture which does not identify the elements in it and is not referenced by the article in question clearly cannot be considered part of "criticism", "comment" or for "teaching" as it supplies no information; it is being used solely for the purposes of adornment and therfore cannot be considered fair use. [[User:KTDiputsho|KTDiputsho]] 14:52, 20 April 2008 (EDT)