88
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: +
Talk:Opposition to classroom prayer (view source)
Revision as of 17:36, April 3, 2008
, 17:36, April 3, 2008no edit summary
Because the article was moved, I am moving the previous page's discussion here. I know it seems a little silly, but there were ongoing discussions - myself and Philip's, for example - that are going very respectfully and well and it would be good to continue them. The material that was on this page is at the bottom now.--[[User:TomMoore|TomMoore]] 00:04, 7 March 2008 (EST)
Because the article was moved, I am moving the previous page's discussion here. I know it seems a little silly, but there were ongoing discussions - myself and Philip's, for example - that are going very respectfully and well and it would be good to continue them. The material that was on this page is at the bottom now.--[[User:TomMoore|TomMoore]] 00:04, 7 March 2008 (EST)
: Should the article have been moved? I don't think so. A general article on classroom prayer could logically be arranged to cover it as a general topic descriptively and historically, then include sections containing arguments supporting classroom prayer and another containing arguments against it. The Evangelical Christian community is not united in support of classroom prayer in public schools and there are some very good religious arguments against it (in addition to the better-known secular arguments). Moving this article to "Opposition to classroom prayer" implies that there is some article in Conservapedia about classroom prayer in general.--[[User:CPlantin|CPlantin]] 12:30, 2 April 2008 (CDT)
== Is it not secular? ==
== Is it not secular? ==