5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 91:
Line 91: + + + + +
→Name-calling: Dan?
Could there be any more damning evidence of the bankruptcy of liberal thought then the incessant campaign of name-calling by liberals against conservatives? If they had a rebuttal to conservative thought, they could simply present it in the [[Marketplace of ideas]]. Calling people liars isn't going to help their cause much. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:14, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
Could there be any more damning evidence of the bankruptcy of liberal thought then the incessant campaign of name-calling by liberals against conservatives? If they had a rebuttal to conservative thought, they could simply present it in the [[Marketplace of ideas]]. Calling people liars isn't going to help their cause much. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:14, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
==Dan?==
Quite frankly, after what happened last night, I'm surpised to find you on a blog like this. I mean really, do the people here know what a party slut you are? Are you trading your rainbow flag for a Republican elephant? Call me. --Bruce