Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:  
: No, we won't be allowing the [[placement bias]] that you suggest.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:36, 8 March 2008 (EST)
 
: No, we won't be allowing the [[placement bias]] that you suggest.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:36, 8 March 2008 (EST)
 
::Andy, I merely propose using your own terms in the manner that you suggest them.  You yourself have said that your examples of deceit are in fact examples of "embraced deceit," which is a subset of run of the mill deceit.  Why do you object to your own term being used?-'''<font color="#CC0000">α</font><font color="#A0A0A0">m</font><font color="#0099FF">ε</font><font color="#003399">σ</font>''' <small>[[User_talk:AmesG | (advocate)]]</small> 15:13, 8 March 2008 (EST)
 
::Andy, I merely propose using your own terms in the manner that you suggest them.  You yourself have said that your examples of deceit are in fact examples of "embraced deceit," which is a subset of run of the mill deceit.  Why do you object to your own term being used?-'''<font color="#CC0000">α</font><font color="#A0A0A0">m</font><font color="#0099FF">ε</font><font color="#003399">σ</font>''' <small>[[User_talk:AmesG | (advocate)]]</small> 15:13, 8 March 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::: Ames, that's not what I said, as not all of the examples are [[embraced deceit]].  I'm not going to spend all afternoon correcting you.  Contribute, or please leave.  Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:18, 8 March 2008 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,341

edits

Navigation menu