Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
172 bytes added ,  14:30, February 21, 2008
Line 183: Line 183:  
:"Everyone knows that radioactive decay is accelerated in catastrophic events" is far too strong a statement. All that I have ever read in the literature is that radioactive decay ''did'' accelerate, perhaps ''once'' in the history of the earth--perhaps during Creation Week, or just before the [[Great Flood]], or sometime in between. I never read any claim that where you get disaster, you get accelerated decay.
 
:"Everyone knows that radioactive decay is accelerated in catastrophic events" is far too strong a statement. All that I have ever read in the literature is that radioactive decay ''did'' accelerate, perhaps ''once'' in the history of the earth--perhaps during Creation Week, or just before the [[Great Flood]], or sometime in between. I never read any claim that where you get disaster, you get accelerated decay.
 
:Beaides: the problem is that ''not'' everybody knows. Our job is to ''tell'' people things that the schools aren't telling them. But we have to make sure that we're telling them the right things.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:55, 20 February 2008 (EST)
 
:Beaides: the problem is that ''not'' everybody knows. Our job is to ''tell'' people things that the schools aren't telling them. But we have to make sure that we're telling them the right things.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:55, 20 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
thanks for explaining.I meant the nuclear delay acceleration during cataclysmal events like volcano eruption. --[[User:Heffalump|Heffalump]] 09:30, 21 February 2008 (EST)
55

edits

Navigation menu