Changes

|2000

|2000

|PG-13

|PG-13

|California Republican governor-to-be [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]] stars in this pro-family, pro-life, anti-cloning adventure as a family man of the future who is illegally cloned. The villain is trying to play God and use to use the cloning to decide who gets to lives and who dies, which Schwarnegger's character objects to.

|California Republican governor-to-be [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]] stars in this pro-family, pro-life, anti-cloning adventure as a family man of the future who is illegally cloned. The villain is trying to play God and use to use the cloning to decide who gets to lives and who dies, to which Schwarzenegger's character objects.

|$34,543,701  

|$34,543,701  

|-

|-

|2009

|2009

|PG-13

|PG-13

|A 37-year-old father reverts to age 17 through a visit to a mysterious janitor and learns that choosing family, which he strives to support however he can, and life over death and possible material riches is much more rewarding and fulfilling even if it is not always apparent. The film stands up for [[abstinence]] and self-respect, and contains a strong speech for both of them, as in this quote: "Because there is no one that I'm in love with. It's called making love, isn't it? Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I think that means you do it with someone you love. And preferably when you're married, when you're ready to take that love and turn it into a baby." The concept of fatherhood is painted positively as well because he ultimately learns he was reverted to age 17 so he could see things from his children's perspectives and help them resolve their problems.

|A 37-year-old father reverts to age 17 through a visit to a mysterious janitor and learns that choosing family, which he strives to support however he can, and life over death and possible material riches is much more rewarding and fulfilling even if it is not always apparent. The film stands up for [[abstinence]] and self-respect, and contains a strong speech for both of them, as in this quote: "Because there is no one that I'm in love with. It's called making love, isn't it? Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I think that means you do it with someone you love. And preferably when you're married, when you're ready to take that love and turn it into a baby." The concept of fatherhood is painted positively as well because he ultimately learns that he was reverted to age 17 so he could see things from his children's perspectives and help them resolve their problems.

|$64,167,069<ref>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=17again.htm</ref>

|$64,167,069<ref>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=17again.htm</ref>

|-

|-

|2013

|2013

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Bio pick of American icon [[Jackie Robinson]]

|Biopic of American icon [[Jackie Robinson]]

|$95,020,213

|$95,020,213

|-

|-

|1984

|1984

|R

|R

|Much the better of the two British big-screen adaptations of [[George Orwell]]'s iconic anti-totalitarian 1949 [[Nineteen Eighty-Four|novel]], Michael Radford's 1984 film starring Richard Burton alongside John Hurt and Suzanna Hamilton as the doomed lovers depicted Airstrip One as a "bleakly beautiful" re-creation of post-war 'Austerity London' by shooting in the derelict Docklands area that Stanley Kubrick would use to great effect two years later filming the second half of Full Metal Jacket. Rab C. Nesbitt fans will be astounded by then-unknown actor Gregor Fisher's faultless English accent as Parsons.

|Much the better of the two British big-screen adaptations of [[George Orwell]]'s iconic anti-totalitarian 1949 [[Nineteen Eighty-Four|novel]], Michael Radford's 1984 film starring Richard Burton alongside John Hurt and Suzanna Hamilton as the doomed lovers depicted Airstrip One as a "bleakly beautiful" re-creation of post-war 'Austerity London' by shooting in the derelict Docklands area that Stanley Kubrick would use to great effect two years later filming the second half of Full Metal Jacket. Rab C. Nesbitt fans will be astounded by then-unknown actor Gregor Fisher's faultless English accent as Parsons.

|$8,430,492

|$8,430,492

|-

|-

|2019

|2019

|PG

|PG

|In this emotional drama, Tom Hanks plays [[Fred Rogers]] who helps a man reconnect with his estanged father.

|In this emotional drama, Tom Hanks plays [[Fred Rogers]] who helps a man reconnect with his estranged father.

|$60,566,849

|$60,566,849

|-

|-

|1994

|1994

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Hero Ace Ventura is an animal lover, but not an animal rights activist, and prefers [[conservation]]. In addition in recent years, liberals have criticized this movie under claims of it "attacking" the LGBT community, as the main villain is a gender-confused man who pretended to be a "woman". Ventura literally freaks out when he realized he really made out with a man, as does everyone else later when they find out the truth. Ventura also calls him by his biological gender.  

|Hero Ace Ventura is an animal lover, but not an animal rights activist, and prefers [[conservation]]. In addition in recent years, liberals have criticized this movie under claims of it "attacking" the LGBT community, as the main villain is a gender-confused man who pretended to be a "woman". Ace literally freaks out when he realized he really made out with a man, as does everyone else later when they find out the truth. Ace also calls him by his biological gender.  

|$72,217,396<ref>https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=aceventura.htm</ref>

|$72,217,396<ref>https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=aceventura.htm</ref>

|-

|-

|1999

|1999

|Not Rated

|Not Rated

|This live-action adaptation of the [[conservative]] text of the same name from [[George Orwell]] (and of the 1954 original animation) uses animals in the pretext of leveling harsh criticism against [[Communism]] and against [[Joseph Stalin]]. Unlike the source material, the film literally shows Animal Farm collapsing due to the excesses posed by the evil Napoleon, a Berkshire boar and a metaphor for Stalin, and his pigs, which is ultimately justified due to the collapse of the Soviet Union years earlier under similar reasons for Animal Farm's collapse.

|This live-action adaptation of the [[conservative]] text of the same name from [[George Orwell]] (and of the 1954 original animation) uses animals in the pretext of leveling harsh criticism against [[Communism]] and against [[Joseph Stalin]]. Unlike the source material, the film literally shows Animal Farm collapsing due to the excesses posed by the evil Napoleon, a Berkshire boar and a allegory for Stalin, and his pigs, which is ultimately justified due to the collapse of the Soviet Union years earlier under similar reasons for Animal Farm's collapse.

|NA - TV

|NA - TV

|-

|-

|1961

|1961

|NR

|NR

|Men are men, women are women. Film also acknowledges the existance of God in one scene when Azor the High Priest tells Princess Antillia that the God she's praying to is false and that the only one who matters lives above

|Men are men, women are women. Film also acknowledges the existence of God in one scene when Azor the High Priest tells Princess Antillia that the God she's praying to is false and that the only one who matters lives above.

|

|

|-

|-

|1988

|1988

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Twelve year Josh Baskin makes a wish on the Zoltar machine to become big, to his discovery his wish is granted. After being through out of the house by his mother who believes his is a kidnapper, he must take in life as an adult. The film teaches the value of [[Childlike Wonder]], as well as [[individualism]] as Josh who is very different than the other workers is more effiecnt and brings new ideas at the toy company being more [[Creativity|creative]] and playful than the other workers. In the end Josh realizes he misses his family and returns home. So a little pro-family message there as well.

|Twelve-year-old Josh Baskin makes a wish on a Zoltar machine to become big; to his discovery, his wish is granted. After being thrown out of the house by his mother who believes he is a kidnapper, he must take in life as an adult. The film teaches the value of [[Childlike Wonder]], as well as [[individualism]] as Josh, being more [[Creativity|creative]] and playful than the other workers, is more efficient and brings new ideas at the toy company. In the end, Josh realizes he misses his family and returns home - a little pro-family message there as well.

|$115,227,281

|$115,227,281

|-

|-

|1996

|1996

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Pro-family film where the idiotic brother of a governor candidate must be straighten out, in order to avoid him hurting his chances in the election. The villain is a corrupt official and feminist, who had committed voter fraud. Also portrays the military (just shown in photographs) in positive light and is also anti-drug.

|Pro-family film where the idiotic brother of a governor candidate must be straightened out, in order to avoid him hurting his chances in the election. The villain is a corrupt official and feminist who commits voter fraud. Also portrays the military (just shown in photographs) in positive light and is also anti-drug.

|$32,417,995

|$32,417,995

|-

|-

|2014

|2014

|PG-13

|PG-13

|A widowed father of three daughters and a divorced mother of two sons accidentally end up staying together in a resort where the parents fall in love. This shows how important it is for a family to have both a mother and a father. It also condemns the homosexual agenda, as it favors traditional gender roles because the father’s oldest daughter gradually gives up her tomboyish style, to actually look like a traditional girl. Also has a celebration of baseball as well.  

|A widowed father of three daughters and a divorced mother of two sons accidentally end up staying together in a resort where the two fall in love. This shows how important it is for a family to have both a mother and a father. It also favors traditional gender roles because the father’s oldest daughter gradually gives up her tomboyish style, to actually look like a traditional girl. Also has a celebration of baseball as well.  

|$46,294,610

|$46,294,610

|-   

|-   

|1984

|1984

|R

|R

|As in ''[[1984]]'', over-arching government is unambiguously shown here to be both an evil and a danger to all humanity, exactly as [[Weber]] foresaw. Made half a decade before the fall of the Berlin Wall, this first film in ex-Python [[Terry Gilliam]]'s "dystopia triptych" - later: Twelve Monkeys (1995), The Zero Theorum (2013) - splendidly dresses its timely, [[Orwell]]ian premise in a [[Kafka]]-esque bureaucratic nightmare of spirit-crushingly dismal yet relentlessly authoritarian mediocrity; not since [[King Lear]] have the 'grey men' of history been so acutely exposed. The later films are difficult to assess by today's standards of conservatism, although Twelve Monkeys is admittedly an outstanding cinematic achievement even if [[Blade Runner]] screen-writer David People's co-written sceenplay is politically harder to place; Zero Theorum's hero, Qohen Leth, is named after Qoheleth/Koheleth, anonymous author of the book of [[Ecclesiastes]], but the only quality Leth seems to share with his wise, jaded, cynically pragmatic namesake is other-worldliness.

|As in ''[[1984]]'', over-arching government is unambiguously shown here to be both an evil and a danger to all humanity, exactly as [[Weber]] foresaw. Made half a decade before the fall of the Berlin Wall, this first film in ex-Python [[Terry Gilliam]]'s "dystopia triptych" - followed by Twelve Monkeys (1995) and The Zero Theorum (2013) - splendidly dresses its timely, [[Orwell]]ian premise in a [[Kafka]]-esque bureaucratic nightmare of spirit-crushingly dismal yet relentlessly authoritarian mediocrity; not since [[King Lear]] have the 'grey men' of history been so acutely exposed. The later films are difficult to assess by today's standards of conservatism, although Twelve Monkeys is admittedly an outstanding cinematic achievement even if [[Blade Runner]] screen-writer David People's co-written screenplay is politically harder to place; Zero Theorum's hero, Qohen Leth, is named after Qoheleth/Koheleth, anonymous author of the book of [[Ecclesiastes]], but the only quality Leth seems to share with his wise, jaded, cynically pragmatic namesake is other-worldliness.

|$9,929,135

|$9,929,135

|-

|-

|2011

|2011

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Based upon the adventures of the patriotic superhero from Marvel Comics (and perhaps the company's most conservative superhero ever created), the frail, sickly U.S. Army recruit Steve Rogers is enhanced to the peak of human physicality by an experimental serum, then uses his newfound supersoldier abilities to combat Nazi terror in Europe while wearing a star-spangled uniform to avoid identification and carrying a throwable shield. Ultimately, he hunts down Nazi supersoldier Johan Schmidt/Red Skull, who was subject to an early, flawed version of Rogers' serum and has stolen the Tesseract, an energy source of unknown potential. Though Rogers succeeds, he is soon left with no choice but to crash Schmidt's aircraft into a glacier, leaving him frozen in suspended animation for decades until he wakes up in 2012 and readies for the events of the next film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, ''The Avengers''. Virtues shown include patriotism, perseverance, and the courage to confront evil dictators. It condemns against globalist views in the climax of the film, as Schmidt, when taunting Rogers, says, "I've seen the future, Captain! There are no flags!", referring to Rogers' choice to fight for his nation rather than harness the power of gods. Rogers rejects his claim by shouting, "Not my future!" Capitalism is painted positively in the form of a young Howard Stark (father of fellow Marvel superhero Tony Stark/Iron Man), who is first seen holding an expo for possible future inventions, including a flying car. The film condemns infidelity and premarital relations as well: British intelligence agent Peggy Carter initially assumes that Rogers is cheating on her (she learns the girl he is first seen dating previously forced herself on him); and, when Howard Stark says "fondue", he says he means a platonic dinner with Carter rather than innuendo for sex.

|Based upon the adventures of the patriotic superhero from Marvel Comics (and perhaps the company's most conservative superhero ever created), the frail, sickly U.S. Army recruit Steve Rogers is enhanced to the peak of human physicality by an experimental serum, then uses his newfound supersoldier abilities to combat Nazi terror in Europe while wearing a star-spangled uniform to avoid identification and carrying a throwable shield. Ultimately, he hunts down Nazi supersoldier Johan Schmidt/Red Skull, who was subject to an early, flawed version of Rogers' serum and has stolen the Tesseract, an energy source of unknown potential. Though Rogers succeeds, he is soon left with no choice but to crash Schmidt's aircraft into a glacier, leaving him frozen in suspended animation for decades until he wakes up in 2012 and readies for the events of the next film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, ''The Avengers''. Virtues shown include patriotism, perseverance, and the courage to confront evil dictators. It condemns against globalist views in the climax of the film, as Schmidt, when taunting Rogers, says, "I've seen the future, Captain! There are no flags!", referring to Rogers' choice to fight for his nation rather than harness the power of gods. Rogers rejects his claim by shouting, "Not my future!" Capitalism is painted positively in the form of a young Howard Stark (father of fellow Marvel superhero Tony Stark/Iron Man), who is first seen holding an expo for possible future inventions, including a flying car. The film condemns infidelity and premarital relations as well: British intelligence agent Peggy Carter initially assumes that Rogers is cheating on her (she learns the girl he is first seen dating previously forced herself on him); and, when Howard says "fondue", he says he means a platonic dinner with Carter rather than innuendo for sex.

|$176,654,505

|$176,654,505

|-

|-

|2016

|2016

|PG-13

|PG-13

|The United Nations proposes that the Avengers, the main superhero team of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, be put under their control. A rift in the team forms because of the disagreement between its two co-leaders: Tony Stark/Iron Man is for this measure, while Steve Rogers/Captain America is against it. Rogers, who believes in self-governance and along with his allies (Bucky Barnes/the Winter Solider, Sam Wilson/Falcon, Wanda Maximoff/Scarlet Witch, Clint Barton/Hawkeye, and Scott Lang/Ant-Man) that it would be harmful to have the Avengers require government permission to fight a crime, never changes his stance on the issue. Through persistence, he prevents the UN from placing the whole group under globalist control.

|The United Nations proposes that the Avengers, the main superhero team of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, be put under their control. A rift in the team forms because of a disagreement between its two co-leaders: Tony Stark/Iron Man is for this measure, while Steve Rogers/Captain America is against it. Rogers, who believes in self-governance and agrees with his allies (Bucky Barnes/the Winter Solider, Sam Wilson/Falcon, Wanda Maximoff/Scarlet Witch, Clint Barton/Hawkeye, and Scott Lang/Ant-Man) that it would be harmful to have the Avengers require government permission to fight a crime, never changes his stance on the issue. Through persistence, he prevents the UN from placing the whole group under globalist control.

|$407,588,905

|$407,588,905

|-

|-

|1942

|1942

|NR

|NR

|This most frequently aired movie on television as of 1977, this film was based on the play "Everybody Comes to Rick's." The triumph in the film of fidelity over promiscuity is a strongly [[conservative]] theme, and this movie portrays [[marriage]], [[love]], and fighting for freedom in a compelling way. This film glorifies self-sacrifice for greater good, and promotes doing what's right even at expense to oneself (Rick, as played by [[Humphrey Bogart]]). [[Vichy France]] and [[Nazi]]s are disparaged. The actors and actresses on the set of the filming conducted themselves admirably off-camera, in contrast with other films, and even played [[chess]] during breaks and in a filmed scene.  

|As the most frequently aired movie on television as of 1977, this film was was based on the play "Everybody Comes to Rick's." The triumph in the film of fidelity over promiscuity is a strongly [[conservative]] theme, and this movie portrays [[marriage]], [[love]], and fighting for freedom in a compelling way. This film glorifies self-sacrifice for greater good, and promotes doing what's right even at expense to oneself (Rick, as played by [[Humphrey Bogart]]). [[Vichy France]] and [[Nazi]]s are disparaged. The actors and actresses on the set of the filming conducted themselves admirably off-camera, in contrast with other films, and even played [[chess]] during breaks and in a filmed scene.  

<br>Minor quibbling about the film focuses on incidental dialogue which implied that Rick had aided and supported the cause of the [[Communist]]s during the [[Spanish Civil War]] (it should be noted that such dialogue was exclusive to the film and not present in the original play<ref>http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~ina22/splaylib/Screenplay-Everybody_Comes_to_Rick's.pdf (dead link, archived version [https://web.archive.org/web/20141224092710/http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~ina22/splaylib/Screenplay-Everybody_Comes_to_Rick's.pdf here])</ref>), and how Lazlo was an "international leader" of a resistance movement against the Nazis hinting at his being a Soviet plant. In addition, one of the screenwriters for the film, Howard Koch, was a notorious communist who was later blacklisted from [[Hollywood]] via the House of Un-American Activities Committee.

<br>Minor quibbling about the film focuses on incidental dialogue which implied that Rick had aided and supported the cause of the [[Communist]]s during the [[Spanish Civil War]] (it should be noted that such dialogue was exclusive to the film and not present in the original play<ref>http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~ina22/splaylib/Screenplay-Everybody_Comes_to_Rick's.pdf (dead link, archived version [https://web.archive.org/web/20141224092710/http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~ina22/splaylib/Screenplay-Everybody_Comes_to_Rick's.pdf here])</ref>), and how Lazlo was an "international leader" of a resistance movement against the Nazis hinting at his being a Soviet plant. In addition, one of the screenwriters for the film, Howard Koch, was a notorious communist who was later blacklisted from [[Hollywood]] via the House of Un-American Activities Committee.

|$3.7 million

|$3.7 million

|2017

|2017

|PG

|PG

|Based on a true story about an atheist couple, ''Chicago Tribune'' reporter Lee Strobel and his wife Leslie, who start to doubt their atheism when a Christian nurse saves their daughter Alison from choking while dining out. Soon after the incident, Leslie realizes that there is a God and converts to Christianity, but the skeptical Lee is not convinced and tries to find evidence to discredit Christianity, only to be proven wrong by evidence presented by a psychologist and a physician. Following the death of his estranged father after Lee brushes off a reconciliation, he realizes that his father had loved him and, following a talk with a colleague, he comes around and also realizes the existence of God and reconciles with Leslie.

|Based on a true story about an atheist couple, ''Chicago Tribune'' reporter Lee Strobel and his wife Leslie, who start to doubt their atheism when a Christian nurse saves their daughter Alison from choking while dining out. Soon after the incident, Leslie realizes that there is a God and converts to Christianity, but the skeptical Lee is not convinced and tries to find evidence to discredit Christianity, only to be proven wrong by evidence presented by a psychologist and a physician. Following the death of his estranged father after Lee brushes off a reconciliation, he realizes that his father had loved him and, following a talk with a colleague, he comes around and also realizes the existence of God and reconciles with Leslie.

|$14,682,684

|$14,682,684

|-

|-

|2004

|2004

|PG

|PG

|Three teenagers try to rob a bank, not for greed but to get money needed for one of their father’s surgery to save his life. In the end, they realize that even though their intentions were good what they did was wrong. They then end up getting the money through donations and generosity rather than theft. Thus giving the movie anti-socialist aspects, and anti-universal healthcare aspects, as they realized it was wrong to take other people’s money to pay for their healthcare.

|Three teenagers try to rob a bank - not for greed - but to get money needed for one's father’s surgery to save his life. In the end, they realize that even though their intentions were good, what they did was still wrong. They then end up getting the money through donations and generosity rather than theft. Thus giving the movie anti-socialist aspects, and anti-universal healthcare aspects, as they realized it was wrong to take other people’s money to pay for their healthcare.

|$16,703,799

|$16,703,799

|-

|-

|2018

|2018

|PG-13

|PG-13

|This Hollywood film doesn't feature any history revisionism and tells the cold hard truth about [[Ted Kennedy]] during the [[Chappaquiddick incident]]<ref>https://www.hollywoodintoto.com/chappaquiddick-review/</ref> angering liberal critics in the process.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/opinion/chappaquiddick-ted-kennedy-distortortion.html</ref> To add insult to injury the film ended up overperforming as well<ref>http://missliberty.com/chappaquiddick-box-office-blows-past-projections/</ref>

|This Hollywood film doesn't feature any history revisionism and tells the cold hard truth about [[Ted Kennedy]] during the [[Chappaquiddick incident]]<ref>https://www.hollywoodintoto.com/chappaquiddick-review/</ref> angering liberal critics in the process.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/opinion/chappaquiddick-ted-kennedy-distortortion.html</ref> To add insult to injury, the film ended up overperforming as well<ref>http://missliberty.com/chappaquiddick-box-office-blows-past-projections/</ref>

|$17,894,212

|$17,894,212

|-

|-

|2005

|2005

|PG

|PG

|In this sequel to the pro-family remake, the Baker family takes a vacation and competes against a rival family in a tournament. In the end, they realize family is what matters most.

|In this sequel to the pro-family remake, the Baker family takes a vacation and competes against a rival family in a tournament. In the end, they realize that family is what matters most.

|$82,571,173

|$82,571,173

|-

|-

|2014

|2014

|R

|R

|A capitalistic chef starts his own restaurant after liberal food critics begin criticizing his work, and he begins questioning why he became a chef in the first place. At the same time, our protagonist Carl Casper also tries to connect with estranged family. The film promotes capitalism and family values in a positive light.

|A capitalistic chef starts his own restaurant after liberal food critics begin criticizing his work, and he begins questioning why he became a chef in the first place. At the same time, our protagonist Carl Casper also tries to connect with his estranged family. The film promotes capitalism and family values in a positive light.

|$31,424,003

|$31,424,003

|-   

|-   

|2018

|2018

|PG

|PG

|Christopher Robin is now an adult; as well as a husband and father. Who unfortuanetly neglects his family for work. Once he is reunited with his old childhood fieneds, his childlike wonder is restored and reconnects with his family.

|Christopher Robin is now an adult as well as a husband and father who unfortunately neglects his family for work. Once he is reunited with his old childhood friends, his childlike wonder is restored and he reconnects with his family.

|$99,215,042

|$99,215,042

|-

|-

|2005

|2005

|PG

|PG

|Based upon the Christian allegory written by C.S. Lewis, four orphans discover the magical realm of Narnia, which can be accessed through a wardrobe, where they are chosen by a prophecy to confront the [[Satan]]-esque White Witch. The omnipotent and benevolent lion Aslan, a stand-in for [[Jesus]], is instrumental in this goal since he frees Narnia from being frozen in a perpetual winter with no Christmas and because he sacrifices himself in place of orphan Edmund, who is temporarily manipulated by the White Witch, and resurrects in a Christ-like manner (according to Aslan, there is a "deeper magic from before the dawn of time" that will resurrect anyone killed in place of a traitor). Besides sacrifice, morals include courage, loyalty, friendship, honor, and redemption.

|Based upon the Christian allegory written by C.S. Lewis, four orphans discover the magical realm of Narnia, which can be accessed through a wardrobe where they are chosen by a prophecy to confront the [[Satan]]-esque White Witch. The omnipotent and benevolent lion Aslan, a stand-in for [[Jesus]], is instrumental in this goal since he frees Narnia from being frozen in a perpetual winter with no Christmas and because he sacrifices himself in place of orphan Edmund, who is temporarily manipulated by the White Witch, and resurrects in a Christ-like manner (according to Aslan, there is a "deeper magic from before the dawn of time" that will resurrect anyone killed in place of a traitor). Besides sacrifice, morals include courage, loyalty, friendship, honor, and redemption.

|$291,709,845

|$291,709,845

|-

|-

|2005

|2005

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Based on the story of boxing heavyweight champion James Braddock, the protagonist prizes family because he takes up boxing so he can provide for them during the Great Depression. In addition, it promotes loyalty and integrity as well, as his promoter not only tried to help him with boxing, but had also gone as far alongside his wife to sell everything they had to aid Braddock in trying to win the titleship, with Braddock's wife learning this when about to tell his promoter off for apparently selling him out.

|Based on the story of boxing heavyweight champion James Braddock, the protagonist prizes family because he takes up boxing so he can provide for them during the Great Depression. In addition, it promotes loyalty and integrity as well, as his promoter not only tries to help him with boxing, but has also - alongside his wife - gone as far as to sell everything they have to aid Braddock in trying to win the titleship, with Braddock's wife learning this when about to tell his promoter off for apparently selling him out.

|$108.5 million

|$108.5 million

|-

|-

|2006

|2006

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Written by Steve Koren & Mark O'Keefe, the same writers of ''[[Bruce Almighty]]'', a man finds a remote control that can control his life and be able to skip many events in it, including many involving his family. He then learns that he should instead appreciate his life and his family to its fullest, and not to be ungrateful with experiences that he thinks, out of selfishness, he doesn't always feel like living.

|Written by Steve Koren & Mark O'Keefe, the same writers of ''[[Bruce Almighty]]'', a man finds a remote control that can control his life and enable him to skip many events in it, including many involving his family. He then learns that he should instead appreciate his life and his family to its fullest, and not to be ungrateful with experiences that he thinks, out of selfishness, he doesn't always feel like living.

|$137,340,146

|$137,340,146

|-

|-

|1977

|1977

|PG

|PG

|Makes this list because of an hilarious, anti-mask scene in which the actor Richard Dreyfuss is riding on a bus where everyone is complying with a government order to wear a mask, whereupon he rips off his mask and declares that there is nothing wrong with the air.

|Makes this list because of a hilarious, anti-mask scene in which the actor Richard Dreyfuss is riding on a bus where everyone is complying with a government order to wear a mask, whereupon he rips off his mask and declares that there is nothing wrong with the air.

|$135,189,114

|$135,189,114

|-

|-

|2015

|2015

|PG-13

|PG-13

|This whistleblower film exposes the [[NFL]]'s ignorance to its players' medical issues that the [[Mainstream media|lamestream media]] has ignored. (See also [[Unplug the NFL]].) The film also may have be the reason to the NFL's rating decline the next year.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtO-w69V4lg</ref>  

|This whistleblower film exposes the [[NFL]]'s ignorance to its players' medical issues that the [[Mainstream media|lamestream media]] has ignored. (See also [[Unplug the NFL]].) The film also may have been the reason for the NFL's rating decline starting the next year.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtO-w69V4lg</ref>  

|$34,542,474

|$34,542,474

|-  

|-  

|1967

|1967

|PG

|PG

|Admires the refusal of a man (played by Paul Newman, while supporting actor George Kennedy won the Oscar) to allow his spirit to be broken, with religious symbolism. This movie glorifies masculinity and portrays the [[Deep South]] favorably.

|Admires the refusal of a man (played by Paul Newman, while supporting actor George Kennedy won the Oscar) to allow his spirit to be broken, complete with religious symbolism. This movie glorifies masculinity and portrays the [[Deep South]] favorably.

|$16,200,000

|$16,200,000

|-

|-

|2015

|2015

|PG-13

|PG-13

|A pro-family comedy, that promotes the concept of fatherhood. The dad and step-dad compete for attention of the kids, in the end they realize they both have the same goal, which is they want what is best for the kids. In addition the film is anti-alcoholism, with Will Ferrell’s character’s getting completely drunk at a basketball game, which cause him to do some hurtful things, which nearly ruins his marriage.

|A pro-family comedy that promotes the concept of fatherhood. The dad and step-dad compete for the attention of the kids, but in the end they realize they both have the same goal, which is what is best for the kids. In addition, the film is anti-alcoholism, with Will Ferrell’s character’s getting completely drunk at a basketball game, which causes him to do some hurtful things, which nearly ruins his marriage.

|$150,357,137

|$150,357,137

|-

|-

|2003

|2003

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Matthew Murdock is Catholic and harassaed by the fake news media.

|Matthew Murdock is Catholic and harassed by the fake news media.

|$102,000,000.

|$102,000,000.

|-

|-

|2008

|2008

|PG-13

|PG-13

|The sequel to ''Batman Begins'' contains a Christian allegory (specifically, the ending has Batman selflessly volunteering to have himself take the blame for the crimes that Harvey Dent committed after the latter went insane from grief and the Joker's influence in order to ensure that the criminals he locked up cannot be released onto the street after he was forced to kill Dent to save Gordon's son.) with messages of not giving in to terrorists and condemning of [[nihilism]] and [[anarchy]] via the actions of [[Joker (comics)|the Joker]], Batman's most infamous adversary.

|The sequel to ''Batman Begins'' contains a Christian allegory (specifically, the ending has Batman selflessly volunteering to have himself take the blame for the crimes that Harvey Dent committed after the latter went insane from both grief and the Joker's influence in order to ensure that the criminals he locked up cannot be released onto the street after he was forced to kill Dent to save Gordon's son.) with messages of not giving in to terrorists and condemning [[nihilism]] and [[anarchy]] via the actions of [[Joker (comics)|the Joker]], Batman's most infamous adversary.

|$533,316,061

|$533,316,061

|-

|-

|1974

|1974

|R

|R

|Bleeding heart New York City liberal Paul Kersey learns the importance of the Second Amendment following a brutal attack on his wife and daughter. Following this he begins fighting back against muggers and is deemed a [[vigilante]]. During this time crime begins to decline (because criminals don't normally attack armed civilians). However contrary to popular belief, the film does not glorify vigilantism, as the film acknowledges that if the vigilante isn't stopped it could led to [[anarchy]] (pure [[Marxism]] is the complete absence of government). Followed by four sequels in 1982, 1985, 1987 and 1994. Remake in 2018.

|Bleeding heart New York City liberal Paul Kersey learns the importance of the Second Amendment following a brutal attack on his wife and daughter. Following this, he begins fighting back against muggers and is deemed a [[vigilante]]. During this time crime begins to decline (because criminals don't normally attack armed civilians). However contrary to popular belief, the film does not glorify vigilantism, as the film acknowledges that if the vigilante isn't stopped it could led to [[anarchy]] (pure [[Marxism]] is the complete absence of government). Followed by four sequels in 1982, 1985, 1987 and 1994. Remake in 2018.

|$22 million     

|$22 million     

|-

|-

|2016

|2016

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Anti-history revisionist film. Writer and historian Deborah E. Lipstadt must battle for historical truth to prove the existence Holocaust when David Irving, a Holocaust denier, sues her for libel .

|Anti-history revisionist film. Writer and historian Deborah E. Lipstadt must battle for historical truth to prove the existence of the Holocaust when David Irving, a Holocaust denier, sues her for libel.

|$4,073,489

|$4,073,489

|-

|-

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Master filmmaker David Lean directed this powerful film that celebrates the natural rights of the individual as well as the triumph of charity, faith, hope, and love. His work takes an honest and uncompromising stance on the dangers of [[Communism]] as well. It won the [[Oscar]] for best picture.

|Master filmmaker David Lean directed this powerful film that celebrates the natural rights of the individual as well as the triumph of charity, faith, hope, and love. His work takes an honest and uncompromising stance on the dangers of [[Communism]] as well. It won the [[Oscar]] for best picture.

<br>Conservatives debated whether the book upon which the movie Doctor Zhivago was based, a ten-year effort by Boris Pasternak, was sufficiently anti-communist.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/10/doctor-zhivago-robert-welch-national-review/</ref>

<br>Conservatives debated whether the book upon which the movie was based, a ten-year effort by Boris Pasternak, was sufficiently anti-communist.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/10/doctor-zhivago-robert-welch-national-review/</ref>

|$111,721,910

|$111,721,910

|-

|-

|1991

|1991

|PG-13

|PG-13

|In this pro-family movie, five siblings (two are teenagers) are left alone for the summer, with no money after their elderly babysitter passes away. They realize the importance of hard work, as well the responsibilities of being indepedent, and the negative effects of drugs. Also gives an anti-regulated economy message by showing the dangers of using and relying on other people's money, as after the younger siblings stole money from their older sister's purse (which she stole from the company with petty cash), they realize this was wrong and selfish. In addition there are brief anti-taxation aspects, with Christina Applegate's character; Sue Ellen being frustrated when they took away so much of her money because of taxation. In the end the teenagers manage to clean themselves up, and quit drinking alcohol, doing drugs and smoking, and focus more on becoming successful adults.

|In this pro-family movie, five siblings (two of whom are teenagers) are left alone for the summer, with no money after their elderly babysitter passes away. They realize the importance of hard work as well the responsibilities of being independent and the negative effects of drugs. Also gives an anti-regulated economy message by showing the dangers of using and relying on other people's money; after the younger siblings stole money from their older sister's purse (which she stole from the company with petty cash), they realize this was wrong and selfish. In addition there are brief anti-taxation aspects, with Christina Applegate's character Sue Ellen being frustrated when they took away so much of her money because of taxation. In the end, the teenagers manage to clean themselves up and quit drinking alcohol, doing drugs, and smoking, and focus more on becoming successful adults.

|$25,196,249<ref>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=donttellmomthebabysittersdead.htm</ref>

|$25,196,249<ref>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=donttellmomthebabysittersdead.htm</ref>

|-

|-

|2012

|2012

|R

|R

| Based on the comic strip ''Judge Dredd''. Anti-drug war film where villains are drug dealers and addicts who are portrayed as very sadistic individuals, the hero Judge Dredd, assisted by a Judge-in-training who is also a psychic, is forced to fight them. The film shows the bravery of the police officers who do what's right, while the film's main villain, a female drug lord nicknamed "Ma-Ma", tries to hinder their progress by calling in several corrupt Judges (akin to the corrupt liberal judges who currently populate various courts in the United States in real life to pervert justice and repeatedly violate the Constitution) to interfere with the honest Judges.

| Based on the comic strip ''Judge Dredd''. Anti-drug war film where the villains are drug dealers and addicts who are portrayed as very sadistic individuals, the hero Judge Dredd, assisted by a Judge-in-training who is also a psychic, is forced to fight them. The film shows the bravery of the police officers who do what's right, while the film's main villain, a female drug lord nicknamed "Ma-Ma", tries to hinder their progress by calling in several corrupt Judges (akin to the corrupt liberal judges who currently populate various courts in the United States in real life to pervert justice and repeatedly violate the Constitution) to interfere with the honest Judges.

|$13,414,714   

|$13,414,714   

|-

|-