nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 198:
Line 198: + +
→Young earth?: No argument; ad hominem attack instead.
: Well, first, your analogy is false... It's more like you saying here's a mechanic who claims all other mechanics agree with him... but putting that aside, as long as you are framing the debate by defining what an expert is, its a waste of my time to bother searching for someone who meets your criteria. I guess it shouldn't surprise me that you will ignore the opinions of so many considering the amount of scientific evidence you ignore on a regular basis. [[User:QNA|QNA]] 18:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
: Well, first, your analogy is false... It's more like you saying here's a mechanic who claims all other mechanics agree with him... but putting that aside, as long as you are framing the debate by defining what an expert is, its a waste of my time to bother searching for someone who meets your criteria. I guess it shouldn't surprise me that you will ignore the opinions of so many considering the amount of scientific evidence you ignore on a regular basis. [[User:QNA|QNA]] 18:25, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
::True, ''that part'' or my analogy wasn't a good one, but what's wrong with me considering professors of Hebrew and Old Testament as more expert than ministers who have been trained to preach, etc., and would not be as knowledgeable on the these matters as those world-class professors. You simply dismiss this aspect without any argument, accusing me of trying to define who is an expert and who isn't, whilst doing the same thing yourself, and instead go for an ''ad hominem'' attack on me, for which you provide no evidence anyway. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:16, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
== Young earth creationist view ==
== Young earth creationist view ==