Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 250: Line 250:     
:: Both of those are false, biased sources of information. Read [http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n2/worthy-ancestors this] please. Thanks [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 11:22, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:: Both of those are false, biased sources of information. Read [http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n2/worthy-ancestors this] please. Thanks [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 11:22, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: AIG is unbiased?  You are saying that AIG is more valid than the Smithsonian Institution? Homo sapiens neanderthalensis is a contraversial subspecies of the Homo sapiens whereas Homo neanderthalensis is the accepted species for the neanderthal.  The correct way of listing taxonomy is genius and then species not genius, species then subspecies.  So by your way of resoning this should be listed under Homo sapiens.  Anyone one with a little biological taxonomy traning would see this as a farse.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 11:33, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
686

edits

Navigation menu