68
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Do we all know what Democrat Presidential candidates stand for yet? (view source)
Revision as of 07:29, May 11, 2007
, 07:29, May 11, 2007→Unsorted
Ah ha, Middle Man and Hoji- now congress knows they've been lied to? By whom? The public statements on Iraq were made well before Bush taking office. You have no trouble finding what democrats stands for is too grey an answer. Let's leave behind the Iraq statements and focus on pre-election '06. Democrats are for reaching across the aisle in a bipartisan fashion. They are against reckless spending of pork projects. They are for removing corrupt officials from power. I can go on and on. Restoring Americas image in the world, would that be pre-9/11? Because I got news for ya, we were still not liked much before then. Maybe we've added the dislike from Europeans since then but Democrats are for 'Image in the World' or is it just what Europeans think that matters? --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 00:02, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
Ah ha, Middle Man and Hoji- now congress knows they've been lied to? By whom? The public statements on Iraq were made well before Bush taking office. You have no trouble finding what democrats stands for is too grey an answer. Let's leave behind the Iraq statements and focus on pre-election '06. Democrats are for reaching across the aisle in a bipartisan fashion. They are against reckless spending of pork projects. They are for removing corrupt officials from power. I can go on and on. Restoring Americas image in the world, would that be pre-9/11? Because I got news for ya, we were still not liked much before then. Maybe we've added the dislike from Europeans since then but Democrats are for 'Image in the World' or is it just what Europeans think that matters? --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 00:02, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
:''They know they'e been lied to? By whom?''
:Donald Rumsfeld, and Colin Powell, for two:
SEC. RUMSFELD: Not at all. If you think — let me take that, both pieces —
the area in the south and the west and the north that coalition forces
control is substantial. It happens not to be the area where weapons of
mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They’re in the
area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.
[http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/05/04/rummy-called-out-in-atlanta/ Crooks and Liars.com] --[[User:Gulik2|Gulik2]] 03:29, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Populism, or at least the appearance thereof in some cases more than others. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:49, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Populism, or at least the appearance thereof in some cases more than others. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:49, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
:Just to point out, jp, I think you equated "Clinton" with "liberal" a bit too much up there, where you said they authorized US troops to go in harms way. And if the conservative administration had not misled (perhaps outright ''lied'') to the legislature, then this whole mess wouldn't have happened; Bush could have been remembered for all the good he did (Though I can't think of anything good that he did). --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:56, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
:Just to point out, jp, I think you equated "Clinton" with "liberal" a bit too much up there, where you said they authorized US troops to go in harms way. And if the conservative administration had not misled (perhaps outright ''lied'') to the legislature, then this whole mess wouldn't have happened; Bush could have been remembered for all the good he did (Though I can't think of anything good that he did). --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:56, 1 May 2007 (EDT)