68
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + +
Debate:Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism? (view source)
Revision as of 17:17, May 10, 2007
, 17:17, May 10, 2007→yes
:::You mean besides 9/11? Or are you saying that the War on Terror begins and ends at the US Border? Because if you take it as a whole, terrorism has only comtinued to ramp up since 9/11. Would the Democrats be better? Until they show me that they are as incompetent as this Administration, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 12:43, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
:::You mean besides 9/11? Or are you saying that the War on Terror begins and ends at the US Border? Because if you take it as a whole, terrorism has only comtinued to ramp up since 9/11. Would the Democrats be better? Until they show me that they are as incompetent as this Administration, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 12:43, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
:::No '''bombings''' in the US--but we had the [[Beltway Sniper]]s and the [[Anthrax Mailer]] since then, and now this thing on the news yesterday about a group of wanna-be raiders planning to attack Fort Dix. And the world that exists '''outside''' the US has had plenty more bombings since Bush announced the Tenth Crusade.
:::On the other hand, just imagine the mess we might be in if Gore or Kerry had been President on 9/11--Osama Bin Laden might have been captured near the Pakistan border, and US troops wouldn't be hopelessly bogged down in Baghdad. What a hideous thought. --[[User:Gulik2|Gulik2]] 13:17, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Yes. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 11:56, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
Yes. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 11:56, 18 April 2007 (EDT)