188
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
no edit summary
: If the C-14 decay rate varies proportionately with the age of the universe, and if that age is, say 5,000 years rather than 10 billion years, then obviously the C-14 decay rate could have been many orders of magnitude larger a thousand years ago.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:51, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
: If the C-14 decay rate varies proportionately with the age of the universe, and if that age is, say 5,000 years rather than 10 billion years, then obviously the C-14 decay rate could have been many orders of magnitude larger a thousand years ago.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:51, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
::It would offcourse help, if one would read why i was speechless, ill quote myself the thirth time: "im speechles, who exactly is claiming that laws of physics have changed so dramatically during these few years and based on what experiments?" But i do think you allready read that, and are just trying not to answer the questions itself. Those questions being. If something like that would have happened in the last 10 000 years, how would anything have survived it? If this is valid argument here, why can't it be used to question everything else in science? [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 14:39, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
== the 50,000 year mark ==
== the 50,000 year mark ==