4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: − I just got another one of those arithmetic problems wrong... the ones you need to solve before adding a link. I '''hate''' it when that happens. (You mean 27 - 4 '''isn't''' 31?) [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 07:48, 5 May 2007 (EDT)+
Debate:Is Darwinism liberal or is it conservative? (view source)
Revision as of 14:48, May 5, 2007
, 14:48, May 5, 2007no edit summary
(I personally think that the descent-with-modification part of evolution is as close to a fact as facts ever get—when dealing with phenomena that are too big to perform experiments on and occur over periods much longer than a human lifetime. I think that scientists are not even close to understanding the sources of variation, that it is not at all clear that variation is "random" or, if nonrandom, what could be guiding it. And I don't think evolution fits neatly into either conservative or liberal ideology.) [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 07:46, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
(I personally think that the descent-with-modification part of evolution is as close to a fact as facts ever get—when dealing with phenomena that are too big to perform experiments on and occur over periods much longer than a human lifetime. I think that scientists are not even close to understanding the sources of variation, that it is not at all clear that variation is "random" or, if nonrandom, what could be guiding it. And I don't think evolution fits neatly into either conservative or liberal ideology.) [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 07:46, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
==Discussion==