1,066
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 295:
Line 295: +
Talk:Science of global warming (view source)
Revision as of 23:12, April 29, 2007
, 23:12, April 29, 2007→Um, please freeze on a version with facts: how interesting
::::::Found atleast [http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686 this] as an partial answer to the question here and above, alltho the report is allready quite old and rapid progres has been made during few years, even at year 2000 this study didnt found '''any''' studyes that disagreed with the consensus. That should allready tell something. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 19:00, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::Found atleast [http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686 this] as an partial answer to the question here and above, alltho the report is allready quite old and rapid progres has been made during few years, even at year 2000 this study didnt found '''any''' studyes that disagreed with the consensus. That should allready tell something. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 19:00, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::: Hmm, interesting quote from that "This analysis shows that scientists publishing in the peer-reviewed literature agree with IPCC, the National Academy of Sciences, and the public statements of their professional societies. Politicians, economists, journalists, and others may have the impression of confusion, disagreement, or discord among climate scientists, but that impression is incorrect." [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 19:12, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
== Celsius ==
== Celsius ==