SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 137:
Line 137: +
Debate:Is it tasteless for Conservapedia to critique the Virginia Tech poem on the Main Page? (view source)
Revision as of 02:19, April 26, 2007
, 02:19, April 26, 2007→The Poem Criticism on the Main Page...: reply2
:: + This is simply another move by Mr. Schlafly to capitalize on this tragedy for his own political ends, nothing more, nothing less. It is in poor taste at best and morally bankrupt at worst. We should be ashamed. [[User:NothingVentured|NothingVentured]] 19:41, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
:: + This is simply another move by Mr. Schlafly to capitalize on this tragedy for his own political ends, nothing more, nothing less. It is in poor taste at best and morally bankrupt at worst. We should be ashamed. [[User:NothingVentured|NothingVentured]] 19:41, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
I think that it's awfully paranoid to assume some conspiracy theory after a tragedy like this. Virginia Tech did not seek to rid the world of christianity after this event (as proved by the numberous crosses/banners provided by the college) - they were a bit too busy mourning.[[User:Iduan|Iduan]] 22:17, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
I think that it's awfully paranoid to assume some conspiracy theory after a tragedy like this. Virginia Tech did not seek to rid the world of christianity after this event (as proved by the numberous crosses/banners provided by the college) - they were a bit too busy mourning.[[User:Iduan|Iduan]] 22:17, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:And saying "We did not deserve this tradgedy" was saying that the students weren't responsible - it's pretty low to politicize something like that.[[User:Iduan|Iduan]] 22:19, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
== The Poem, as it is placed on the front page ==
== The Poem, as it is placed on the front page ==