3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 83:
Line 83: + + +
Debate:What exactly is Conservapedia? (view source)
Revision as of 18:17, April 25, 2007
, 18:17, April 25, 2007→Is Conservapedia neutral or onesided
:I'd like to see this thread continued at [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia neutral or onesided?]] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:13, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
:I'd like to see this thread continued at [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia neutral or onesided?]] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:13, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
Famously, Conservapedia refuses to define sexual intercourse so that children may be "protected" from the "vulgar" details of the act. All I can say is, don't be surprised when your kid comes home pregnant because you were too foolish to inform them of EVERY SINGLE important detail surrounding sex (i.e., protection). Believe it or not, your children [i]probably[/i] will have sex in their teens (indeed, despite their good Christian upbringings), and it is extremely dangerous to withhold such crucial information from them. [i]Many[/i] so-called "conservative" parents who are so-called "pro-life" suddenly have a drastic change of heart when their kids come home knocked-up. Don't keep your kids in the dark, you will likely regret it.