| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems''' are two theorems published in 1931 by [[Kurt Gödel]] that show that all sufficiently strong first-order theories can never yield answers to all mathematical questions--they are incomplete. | + | '''Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems''' are two theorems published in 1931 by [[Kurt Gödel]] that show that all sufficiently strong first-order theories can never yield answers to all mathematical questions—they are incomplete. |
| | | | |
| | '''Gödel's First Incompleteness Theorem''': If T is any [[consistency|consistent]], [[sound]], [[recursion|recursively enumerable]] first-order theory containing the axioms of [[Peano Arithmetic]], there is a sentence G_T such that T cannot prove G_T and such that T cannot prove ~G_T. This means that T is not complete: there is some statement (G_T) that cannot be proved or refuted in the theory T. | | '''Gödel's First Incompleteness Theorem''': If T is any [[consistency|consistent]], [[sound]], [[recursion|recursively enumerable]] first-order theory containing the axioms of [[Peano Arithmetic]], there is a sentence G_T such that T cannot prove G_T and such that T cannot prove ~G_T. This means that T is not complete: there is some statement (G_T) that cannot be proved or refuted in the theory T. |
| | | | |
| − | The statement G_T says "G_T is not provable in T". This statement is encoded in [[number theory]]--symbols of [[first-order language|first-order logic]] are assigned numbers in such a way so that statements in logic can be viewed as statements about numbers. Further, this statement refers to itself; that this is possible is the key to Godel's argument. | + | The statement G_T says "G_T is not provable in T". This statement is encoded in [[number theory]]—symbols of [[first-order language|first-order logic]] are assigned numbers in such a way so that statements in logic can be viewed as statements about numbers. Further, this statement refers to itself; that this is possible is the key to Godel's argument. |
| | | | |
| − | Recursively enumerable (r.e.) theories are theories that can be written down in a mechanical way. The restriction to recursively enumerable theories is required, since it is easy to construct non-r.e. theories that are complete--for example, the theory that contains exactly all true statements of number theory is complete, but cannot be written down in a mechanical way. | + | Recursively enumerable (r.e.) theories are theories that can be written down in a mechanical way. The restriction to recursively enumerable theories is required, since it is easy to construct non-r.e. theories that are complete—for example, the theory that contains exactly all true statements of number theory is complete, but cannot be written down in a mechanical way. |
| | | | |
| | The first incompleteness theorem is itself a theorem of Peano Arithmetic. A corollary of this fact, noted independently by [[John von Neumann]] and Gödel, is the: | | The first incompleteness theorem is itself a theorem of Peano Arithmetic. A corollary of this fact, noted independently by [[John von Neumann]] and Gödel, is the: |